User Requirement Registry

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Revision as of 04:42, July 14, 2010 by Rhusar (talk | contribs)

< GEO User Requirements for Air Quality | Report | Documents | Resources

Erin: Make Dynamic List for URR Tags

See also GEOSS User Requirements Registry

User Requirements Registry (D. Niebert, 2009)

GEOSS Registries

  • Stores requirements by generalized user types that identify observables and their properties (e.g. values, quality, resolution, frequency, units of measure) with respect to a domain of application
  • Matching of requirements to service offers can be made in the future as a common vocabulary of observables is developed for GEOSS to:
    • Identify coverage and popularity of observations, and
    • Identify gaps in coverage of observations

URR Administrative

  • UIC recommends the inclusion of a requirements registry for earth observations to be integrated with the existing

services and standards. Requirements available from several members.

    • Joint effort and discussion document with UIC is needed to clarify the needs, interaction, governance, and approach of a solution; Could this be achieved through a new Task?
  • GEOSS Earth Observation taxonomy or ontology suggested to facilitate association of requirements, services, and applications
    • Identify requirements for “observables” ontology drawn from the existing EO communities in order to associate applications, needs, and available services

Tie in with ADC GCI:

  • Need to formalize UIC commitment for the operation and interaction with the registry – significant governance issue
  • Web-form upload by privileged individuals anticipated
  • Batch upload from existing requirements systems also anticipated
  • Architectural tie-points exist between the “observations” (observable parameters) and the Services and Standards Registries

  • Continued web services and database support to be offered by this Task to UIC during IOC

User Requirements Registry Features (Gary Foley)

  • A “user engagement” entry point for the Novice Users coming to the GEO Home Page
  • Initially populated from the US-09-01a reports
  • Shares info on registered types, applications and requirements; allows users to comment
  • Allows users to register their type, applications, and requirements
  • A standard vocabulary/ontology for use in registration
  • Provides requirements for “Gap Analysis”

User Classes for Air Quality (Gary Foley)

  • Public Information Delivery
  • Public Emergency & Health Officials
  • Operational Modeling Forecasting
  • Local & Regional Environmental managers
  • Earth Observation Community

Activities of Each User Class

HP Plag:

  • SBA-Specific Work Flow Scenarios and Test Cases

Three Test Cases:

  • Air Quality and Health: Results of the SBA analysis (sub-SBA Health)
  • Geohazards: 2008 Review of Requirements (sub-SBA Disaster)
  • GGOS 2020: Cross-cutting (at least seven SBAs)

Activities

  • Participate in monthly calls of the Analysts
    • Two face-to-face meetings of the Analysts
    • Assist with developing concepts and approaches for cross-cutting analyses of the observational priorities and other important information from the 2009 US-09-01a primary reports.
  • Conduct further analyses of the area of the Health SBA that would further this cross-cutting effort.
  • Engage the AG
    • Replace members, as needed.
    • Ensure that the AG members have access to the primary and secondary products, as appropriate.
  • Database of keywords for the Health SBA area using the 2009 US-09-01a report as the source material for the keywords.
  • Populating the User Requirements Registry (URR) and databases with the appropriate information from the primary and secondary products of the 2009 work.
  • Conduct an international GEO workshop in the aeroallergens area of the Health SBA jointly with other sponsors to
    • engage users
    • engage observation providers
    • support new Communities of Practice
    • present the results of this task
    • further populate the URR
    • share new GEO-relevant scientific and technical results
    • identify voluntary efforts to initiate additional activities, etc.