Difference between revisions of "Water Cluster Telecons"

Latest revision as of 14:09, July 22, 2012

Main ESIP page >> Main Water Clusterpage

December 3, 2009 Telecon

1-3 pm EST
Phone: Meeting Number: 877-326-0011
Meeting Code: *7884944*
GoTo Meeting Link: https://www2.gotomeeting.com/join/203214995

Topics

(feel free to add agenda items)
1. Recap of Last Meeting
2. GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot 3 (AIP-3), George Percivall http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=36656
3. Water Cluster Activities at Winter ESIP Federation meeting
4. Discussion Draft Water Cluster Vision Statement
5. Date of Next Meeting (January 5-7, 2010)

Meeting Docs

Participants

George Percivall
Bill Sonntag
Carol Meyer
Brand Niemann
Christine Eggers
Luis Bermudez
Rob Raskin
Todd Dabolt
Brian Rogan
Gary Foley
Rob Fatland
Jami Montgomery
Phil Yang
Will Pozzi

Notes

1. Round robin introductions were made
2. Last Meeting Recap

Winter meeting activities and session breakdown
Need a couple of use cases by end of meeting for proof of concept (EPA, others?)
Need identify someone to lead ontology management
Outreach: Ontology meeting during AGU; NIDIS/NOAA; NASA
Vision statement

3. George Percivall, OGC - GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot 3

Looking for a Drought scenario
AIP Task - pilot new processes in support of creating the GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI)
work collaboratively across GEO committees (e.g. UIC to get user needs)
AIP 2 Achievements

Community of Practice Scenarios
Reusable Processes
SBAs covered: Disaster Management, Air Quality & Health, Energy, Biodiversity and Climate Change

AIP 3 (call to be issued in January 2010)

Build on GCI Community Services
Engage new Communities of Practice
Focus on Data; Promote Content
Results in time to support EO Summit (Nov. 2010, Beijing)

Use Cases (SOA)
Scenarios (end users)
Drought Scenario

Asian Water Cycle, SDSC, FCU, CUASHI, JAXA, EuroGEOSS, ESIP, GEO Water CoP
Hydrology Interoperability Experiment (OGC activity) - standards development/refinement as opposed to the GEOSS AIP which seeks to apply interoperability arrangements to SBAs
Candidate Scenario was previously developed under AIP2 but didn't have critical mass to move forward
Other scenario suggestion: visual beach (environmental indicator)

How to Get Involved

No funding provided
Help with scenario development
Semantic mediation use case

Action Items:

Link to NIDIS for scenario
Poll Cluster members about Drought or Water Quality scenario
All - Review and edit Draft vision statemente for Water Cluster

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 |}<br />
-==May 6 2010 Telecon==
+==December 3, 2009 Telecon==
-pm EST <br>
+-3 pm EST <br>
 Phone: Meeting Number:  877-326-0011<br>
 Meeting Code:  *7884944*<br>
+GoTo Meeting Link: https://www2.gotomeeting.com/join/203214995
 ===Topics===
+(feel free to add agenda items) <br>
-*Introduction of Participants
+. Recap of Last Meeting <br>
-*Review of last call
+. GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot 3 (AIP-3), George Percivall   http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=36656 <br>
-*AIP-3 Gulf of Maine use case discussion
+. [[Water Cluster Activities]] at Winter ESIP Federation meeting <br>
-*Preparation for Summer Meeting
+. Discussion Draft [[Vision Statement for Water Cluster |Water Cluster Vision Statement]] <br>
-*Other topics raised by participants
+. Date of Next Meeting (January 5-7, 2010)
-*Adjournment
 ===Meeting Docs===
+===Participants===
+:*George Percivall
+:*Bill Sonntag
+:*Carol Meyer
+:*Brand Niemann
+:*Christine Eggers
+:*Luis Bermudez
+:*Rob Raskin
+:*Todd Dabolt
+:*Brian Rogan
+:*Gary Foley
+:*Rob Fatland
+:*Jami Montgomery
+:*Phil Yang
+:*Will Pozzi
 ===Notes===
+. Round robin introductions were made <br>
+. Last Meeting Recap
+:*Winter meeting activities and session breakdown
+:*Need a couple of use cases by end of meeting for proof of concept (EPA, others?)
+:*Need identify someone to lead ontology management
+:*Outreach: Ontology meeting during AGU; NIDIS/NOAA; NASA
+:*Vision statement
+. George Percivall, OGC - GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot 3
+:*Looking for a Drought scenario
+:*AIP Task - pilot new processes in support of creating the GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI)
+:*work collaboratively across GEO committees (e.g. UIC to get user needs)
+:*AIP 2 Achievements
+::*Community of Practice Scenarios
+::*Reusable Processes
+::*
+::*SBAs covered: Disaster Management, Air Quality & Health, Energy, Biodiversity and Climate Change
+:*AIP 3 (call to be issued in January 2010)
+::*Build on GCI Community Services
+::*Engage new Communities of Practice
+::*Focus on Data; Promote Content
+::*Results in time to support EO Summit (Nov. 2010, Beijing)
+:*Use Cases (SOA)
+:*Scenarios (end users)
+:*Drought Scenario
+::*Asian Water Cycle, SDSC, FCU, CUASHI, JAXA, EuroGEOSS, ESIP, GEO Water CoP
+::*Hydrology Interoperability Experiment (OGC activity) - standards development/refinement as opposed to the GEOSS AIP which seeks to apply interoperability arrangements to SBAs
+::*Candidate Scenario was previously developed under AIP2 but didn't have critical mass to move forward
+::*Other scenario suggestion: visual beach (environmental indicator)
+:*How to Get Involved
+::*No funding provided
+::*Help with scenario development
+::*Semantic mediation use case
-'''Water Telecon – April 1, 2010'''
-'''Present'''
-*Bill Sonntag
-*Brian Rogan
-*Carol Meyer
-*Luis Bermudez
-*Bruce Bargemeyer
-*Jami Montgomery
-'''Review of notes from last call'''
-There was a brief discussion of the notes from the last call
-'''Discussion of use case development, status of discussions with Gulf of Maine programs'''
-Bill spent time last week talking with people about the use case development. The drought scenarios are moving forward quickly according to Will Pozzi.  They are using the work of CUASHI and HydroSeek and adding to it.  It is hoped that there can be a finalized use case scenario for the Gulf of Maine soon.  There are some significant developments:
-*MMI has been involved in the Gulf of Maine for a significant amount of time
-*Go MOOS has just gotten a new grant from the EPA as the lead in a multi state proposal.  It has been approved.  They have become GoMRI
-*The interest in the ecoinformatics process as an institution in North America ties in as well.
-'''AIP-3 Process update'''
-We currently have the capability of getting something in by May 3 to GEO.  While it may not work for the ministerial meeting there are some already selected for that meeting.
-'''Semantic ontology management - path forward'''
-Previous work to build a semantic architecture was a bit optimistic that it could be done quickly but it needs to continue to be worked on.
-One big question is how do we manage ontologies.
-We have not gotten to the point where we are picking management schemes in the water domain.
-In other informatics context, we have had  a chance to look at the Stanford BioPortal.  Luis feels that this the cornerstone of work at MMI
-We are setting the stage to demonstrate the utility of an array of registries that will work for us.  We are in a wait and see on the use case at this point.
-Bill is proposing that the group have deliberations on some of the utilities.   At the ESIP meeting, we can have a workshop to get the APIs and start to do some experiments with them to see how they serve us.
-Bruce has been looking at the BioPortal and MMI portal to track evolutionary patterns.  He is finding the MMI is using the backend of BioPortal.  He is hoping that it can keep up.
-He feels that it will be similar to XMR in the future.
-Richard Hooper was going to expand the ontology used in HydroSeek.  Greg Ondich who is doing work for Gary Foley is also doing some ontology work and he is working with him to point out the work that has already been done.
-Bruce wants to be sure the onotology work is coordinated between the different groups.
-Luis wondered if this can be folded into the AIP initiative
-Bill mentioned that there is a potential to work with the ontologies group headed by Peter Fox to have a collaborative effort at the Summer Meeting.
-There would be a  series of demonstrations of portals that could occur during the next telecons leading up to the meeting.
-We need to determine what can be accomplished between now and July and we need to reach out to the semantics group to see what we can do.  There is also work that can be done with the Decisions cluster.
-What are the difficult questions that still need to be answered?  It is worth trying to establish this list before moving forward.
-Scientists want to know for a particular time when something passes a particular point and compare it to previous data.  It helps to be able to determine how well the buoys or other sensors are working.
-Bill will be sending around an email to compile a series of questions for the next conversation.
-'''Activities for ESIP Summer meeting'''
-Interest in reaching out to the other groups and see what kind of collaborations can created.
-'''Other topics'''
-There were no other topics suggested.
-The meeting was adjourned at 3:45 PM
+Action Items:
+:*Link to NIDIS for scenario
+:*Poll Cluster members about Drought or Water Quality scenario
+:*All - Review and edit Draft vision statemente for Water Cluster
 ===Action Items===
 ==[[Previous Telecons]]==