Difference between revisions of "Solta 2011 Pre-Meeting Agenda"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
, and by this we imply that there shall be enough room for discussions so that actual obstacles can be identified and both a vision and a workplan can be designed how to move this forward. In order to make efficient use of our time in Croatia, we ask you all to prepare for the workshop in the following ways (aside from arranging your travel etc.): | , and by this we imply that there shall be enough room for discussions so that actual obstacles can be identified and both a vision and a workplan can be designed how to move this forward. In order to make efficient use of our time in Croatia, we ask you all to prepare for the workshop in the following ways (aside from arranging your travel etc.): | ||
| − | === 1. Self-Introduction, 3-4 slides, 5-6 min/participant, 2hrs total === | + | ==== 1. Self-Introduction, 3-4 slides, 5-6 min/participant, 2hrs total ==== |
Slides 1-2: Name, Institution, Relevant research, development or organizational work on AQ data system interoperability and networking | Slides 1-2: Name, Institution, Relevant research, development or organizational work on AQ data system interoperability and networking | ||
Slide(s) 3-(4): Involvement and participation in projects, programs, i.e. list of Integrating Initiatives. | Slide(s) 3-(4): Involvement and participation in projects, programs, i.e. list of Integrating Initiatives. | ||
| − | === 2. Description of AQ data systems === | + | ==== 2. Description of AQ data systems ==== |
* Standards-based data servers | * Standards-based data servers | ||
* Other data portals, file servers | * Other data portals, file servers | ||
* Standards and conventions (netCDF, CF, OGC W*S, ISO) | * Standards and conventions (netCDF, CF, OGC W*S, ISO) | ||
| − | === 3. Common issues with current systems=== | + | ==== 3. Common issues with current systems==== |
In order to help structuring this information, the categories below are suggested, subject to modifications. Note that explicit discussion of metadata is left for future sessions. Guiding ..What few things must be the same, so that everything else can be different? | In order to help structuring this information, the categories below are suggested, subject to modifications. Note that explicit discussion of metadata is left for future sessions. Guiding ..What few things must be the same, so that everything else can be different? | ||
* standard definitions (clarity, ambiguity, completeness, ...) | * standard definitions (clarity, ambiguity, completeness, ...) | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
* governance, responsibilities, etc. | * governance, responsibilities, etc. | ||
| − | === Discussion of Issues === | + | ==== Discussion of Issues === = |
* how to structure issues | * how to structure issues | ||
* how to improve the situation | * how to improve the situation | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
* clear statements about obstacles..no organizational structure, no funding or no clear idea yet how to do it. | * clear statements about obstacles..no organizational structure, no funding or no clear idea yet how to do it. | ||
| − | === Future: Short-term, Longer-term === | + | ==== Future: Short-term, Longer-term ==== |
* Target User communities | * Target User communities | ||
| − | * Use cases for different applications from scientists to managers, media people and the general public)? | + | * Use cases for different applications... from scientists to managers, media people and the general public)? |
| − | * | + | * How can users find out about (each) system? |
| − | + | * What shall be common and where can they differ? | |
| + | * Big future issues: data quality, traceability, metadata.. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Tangible WS result ==== | ||
| + | * Near term AQ network work plan. | ||
| + | * ?? | ||
| + | * ?? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | in light of the results obtained from the longer-term future discussions. This work plan shall be a tangible result from the workshop and we hope that it can then also be used to attract further funding to continue and expand on the ongoing activities. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Web form | ||
| + | For these discussions we will approach a few of you individually and ask you to prepare short "seed presentations" to give your view on some of these points. | ||
Revision as of 01:26, July 5, 2011
< Back to 
| Workshops | Air Quality Data Network
Dear Colleagues,
Thank you again for expressing your interest in the Air Quality Community of Practice meeting in Solta, Croatia (23-25 August 2011). The motto of the workshop is Connecting air quality data: from virtual to real
, and by this we imply that there shall be enough room for discussions so that actual obstacles can be identified and both a vision and a workplan can be designed how to move this forward. In order to make efficient use of our time in Croatia, we ask you all to prepare for the workshop in the following ways (aside from arranging your travel etc.):
1. Self-Introduction, 3-4 slides, 5-6 min/participant, 2hrs total
Slides 1-2: Name, Institution, Relevant research, development or organizational work on AQ data system interoperability and networking Slide(s) 3-(4): Involvement and participation in projects, programs, i.e. list of Integrating Initiatives.
2. Description of AQ data systems
- Standards-based data servers
- Other data portals, file servers
- Standards and conventions (netCDF, CF, OGC W*S, ISO)
3. Common issues with current systems
In order to help structuring this information, the categories below are suggested, subject to modifications. Note that explicit discussion of metadata is left for future sessions. Guiding ..What few things must be the same, so that everything else can be different?
- standard definitions (clarity, ambiguity, completeness, ...)
- standard development and documentation
- open-source server software development
- platform issues, portability
- coding language(s), code interchangeability
- coding style and software development approaches
- Data Content
- organisation of data
- data formats, standard compliance
- data access
- performance
- flexibility
- user friendliness
- meeting user demands (fitness for purpose)
- governance, responsibilities, etc.
=== Discussion of Issues ===
- how to structure issues
- how to improve the situation
- identification of manageable work packages where possible
- clear statements about obstacles..no organizational structure, no funding or no clear idea yet how to do it.
Future: Short-term, Longer-term
- Target User communities
- Use cases for different applications... from scientists to managers, media people and the general public)?
- How can users find out about (each) system?
- What shall be common and where can they differ?
- Big future issues: data quality, traceability, metadata..
Tangible WS result
- Near term AQ network work plan.
- ??
- ??
in light of the results obtained from the longer-term future discussions. This work plan shall be a tangible result from the workshop and we hope that it can then also be used to attract further funding to continue and expand on the ongoing activities.
Web form For these discussions we will approach a few of you individually and ask you to prepare short "seed presentations" to give your view on some of these points.
