Difference between revisions of "Water Cluster Telecons"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(Reverted edits by Brogan (talk) to last revision by Carolbmeyer)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|}<br />
 
|}<br />
  
==March 4th 2010 Telecon==
+
==December 3, 2009 Telecon==
3 pm EST <br>   
+
1-3 pm EST <br>   
 
Phone: Meeting Number:  877-326-0011<br>
 
Phone: Meeting Number:  877-326-0011<br>
 
Meeting Code:  *7884944*<br>
 
Meeting Code:  *7884944*<br>
 
+
GoTo Meeting Link: https://www2.gotomeeting.com/join/203214995
  
 
===Topics===
 
===Topics===
 
+
(feel free to add agenda items) <br>
1. Introductions & Opening Comments
+
1. Recap of Last Meeting <br>
 
+
2. GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot 3 (AIP-3), George Percivall  http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=36656 <br>
2 Water Cluster Activities at Winter ESIP Federation Meeting
+
3. [[Water Cluster Activities]] at Winter ESIP Federation meeting <br>
 
+
4. Discussion Draft [[Vision Statement for Water Cluster |Water Cluster Vision Statement]] <br>
3 Discussion of ESIP Water Cluster Use Case Development
+
5. Date of Next Meeting (January 5-7, 2010)
 
 
4 GEOSS AIP-3 Process Status discussion
 
 
 
5. Other Business
 
 
 
6. Date of next Teleconference
 
  
 
===Meeting Docs===
 
===Meeting Docs===
  
  
 
+
===Participants===
 +
:*George Percivall
 +
:*Bill Sonntag
 +
:*Carol Meyer
 +
:*Brand Niemann
 +
:*Christine Eggers
 +
:*Luis Bermudez
 +
:*Rob Raskin
 +
:*Todd Dabolt
 +
:*Brian Rogan
 +
:*Gary Foley
 +
:*Rob Fatland
 +
:*Jami Montgomery
 +
:*Phil Yang
 +
:*Will Pozzi
  
 
===Notes===
 
===Notes===
'''Water cluster Meeting – February 4, 2010'''
+
1. Round robin introductions were made <br>
 
+
2. Last Meeting Recap
'''Present:'''
+
:*Winter meeting activities and session breakdown
Brian Rogan Carol Meyer Bill Sonntag
+
:*Need a couple of use cases by end of meeting for proof of concept (EPA, others?)
Chuck Spooner Will Pozzi Rob Raskin
+
:*Need identify someone to lead ontology management
Bill Sonntag Stephanie Granger Carol Meyer
+
:*Outreach: Ontology meeting during AGU; NIDIS/NOAA; NASA
Jamie Montgomery Christine Eggers
+
:*Vision statement
 
+
3. George Percivall, OGC - GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot 3
'''Introductions & Opening Comments'''
+
:*Looking for a Drought scenario
 
+
:*AIP Task - pilot new processes in support of creating the GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI)
Meeting began at 3:05 pm
+
:*work collaboratively across GEO committees (e.g. UIC to get user needs)
 
+
:*AIP 2 Achievements
'''Water Cluster Activities at Winter ESIP Federation Meeting'''
+
::*Community of Practice Scenarios
 
+
::*Reusable Processes
There were no particular comments on activities from the winter meeting.
+
::*
 
+
::*SBAs covered: Disaster Management, Air Quality & Health, Energy, Biodiversity and Climate Change
'''Discussion of ESIP Water Cluster Use Case Development'''
+
:*AIP 3 (call to be issued in January 2010)
Will discussed the importance of the Chesapeake to the use case.  The use case is interesting enough that anyone’s system could be added as a line item very easily.  He mentioned that the use case would essentially be an excel spreadsheet.  The idea being to expose how much metadata is collected and to compare it to some of the standards for non-continuous data.  The idea is to talk about the demands of interoperability.  They will be collecting and preserving data that is amenable to comparability.  U Md is on board so it gives us several types of buoys. 
+
::*Build on GCI Community Services
 
+
::*Engage new Communities of Practice
Will discussed other buoys and feels the next steps is to get a standard descriptin email of what it consists of and that the people who think they can participate will participate.  
+
::*Focus on Data; Promote Content
 
+
::*Results in time to support EO Summit (Nov. 2010, Beijing)
Stephanie mentioned that the last telecon her writing up a narrative for the San Joaquin valley.  What would it take for that to happen. 
+
:*Use Cases (SOA)
This would be at a higher level.  The problem statement has been developed. 
+
:*Scenarios (end users)
 
+
:*Drought Scenario
Will suggested that Stephanie write it up in a template. He would send the template.
+
::*Asian Water Cycle, SDSC, FCU, CUASHI, JAXA, EuroGEOSS, ESIP, GEO Water CoP
 
+
::*Hydrology Interoperability Experiment (OGC activity) - standards development/refinement as opposed to the GEOSS AIP which seeks to apply interoperability arrangements to SBAs
Both of these qualifiers are good for use case based on GEOSS.
+
::*Candidate Scenario was previously developed under AIP2 but didn't have critical mass to move forward
 
+
::*Other scenario suggestion: visual beach (environmental indicator)
George Percival is preparing a section dealing with semantics. Ontologies are also coming up with the geophysical parameters.  
+
:*How to Get Involved
 
+
::*No funding provided
 
+
::*Help with scenario development
'''GEOSS AIP-3 Process Status discussions'''
+
::*Semantic mediation use case
It is hoped that the same thing that happened with AQ can happen with water.  There are a number of scenarios for biodiversity, water, AQ, energy as well as others.  Once the template is submitted, the kickoff meeting will be held in Italy. 
 
AIP 3 is set up to provide demonstration products for the meeting to be held in late November or early December.
 
Carol asked if the water community of practice has submitted anything.   They are going to pick ten projects that will be featured at the ministerial summit in Beijing.
 
There may be an opportunity to have a broader impact.
 
 
 
There should be no problem getting an ESIP project in an IWGO presentation .
 
 
 
There is going to be a tight timeline in getting a submission in order for the IWGO meeting.
 
CUASHI is interested and it would be worth getting them involved.  It would be a benefit to get all of these groups together to brainstorm.
 
 
 
All three groups will need to come together in a telecon to see if they all have something to put on the table for either the Chesapeake case or the California case.
 
 
 
Chuck and Will will discuss this at a meeting on Monday
 
  
'''Other Business'''
 
No Action items
 
  
'''Date of next Teleconference'''
 
It was decided to post a doodle poll on the water cluster listerv to determine a good time to have a regular meeting.
 
  
Meeting adjourned at 3:30 PM
+
Action Items:
 +
:*Link to NIDIS for scenario
 +
:*Poll Cluster members about Drought or Water Quality scenario
 +
:*All - Review and edit Draft vision statemente for Water Cluster
  
 
===Action Items===
 
===Action Items===
  
 
==[[Previous Telecons]]==
 
==[[Previous Telecons]]==

Latest revision as of 13:09, July 22, 2012

Main ESIP page >> Main Water Clusterpage


December 3, 2009 Telecon

1-3 pm EST
Phone: Meeting Number: 877-326-0011
Meeting Code: *7884944*
GoTo Meeting Link: https://www2.gotomeeting.com/join/203214995

Topics

(feel free to add agenda items)
1. Recap of Last Meeting
2. GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot 3 (AIP-3), George Percivall http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=36656
3. Water Cluster Activities at Winter ESIP Federation meeting
4. Discussion Draft Water Cluster Vision Statement
5. Date of Next Meeting (January 5-7, 2010)

Meeting Docs

Participants

  • George Percivall
  • Bill Sonntag
  • Carol Meyer
  • Brand Niemann
  • Christine Eggers
  • Luis Bermudez
  • Rob Raskin
  • Todd Dabolt
  • Brian Rogan
  • Gary Foley
  • Rob Fatland
  • Jami Montgomery
  • Phil Yang
  • Will Pozzi

Notes

1. Round robin introductions were made
2. Last Meeting Recap

  • Winter meeting activities and session breakdown
  • Need a couple of use cases by end of meeting for proof of concept (EPA, others?)
  • Need identify someone to lead ontology management
  • Outreach: Ontology meeting during AGU; NIDIS/NOAA; NASA
  • Vision statement

3. George Percivall, OGC - GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot 3

  • Looking for a Drought scenario
  • AIP Task - pilot new processes in support of creating the GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI)
  • work collaboratively across GEO committees (e.g. UIC to get user needs)
  • AIP 2 Achievements
  • Community of Practice Scenarios
  • Reusable Processes
  • SBAs covered: Disaster Management, Air Quality & Health, Energy, Biodiversity and Climate Change
  • AIP 3 (call to be issued in January 2010)
  • Build on GCI Community Services
  • Engage new Communities of Practice
  • Focus on Data; Promote Content
  • Results in time to support EO Summit (Nov. 2010, Beijing)
  • Use Cases (SOA)
  • Scenarios (end users)
  • Drought Scenario
  • Asian Water Cycle, SDSC, FCU, CUASHI, JAXA, EuroGEOSS, ESIP, GEO Water CoP
  • Hydrology Interoperability Experiment (OGC activity) - standards development/refinement as opposed to the GEOSS AIP which seeks to apply interoperability arrangements to SBAs
  • Candidate Scenario was previously developed under AIP2 but didn't have critical mass to move forward
  • Other scenario suggestion: visual beach (environmental indicator)
  • How to Get Involved
  • No funding provided
  • Help with scenario development
  • Semantic mediation use case


Action Items:

  • Link to NIDIS for scenario
  • Poll Cluster members about Drought or Water Quality scenario
  • All - Review and edit Draft vision statemente for Water Cluster

Action Items

Previous Telecons