Difference between revisions of "Module Review Criteria"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
m (moved Review criteria to Module Review Criteria) |
|||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
* Resources listed on the "Resource" slide include a single phrase or short sentence explanation followed on the next line with a live URL | * Resources listed on the "Resource" slide include a single phrase or short sentence explanation followed on the next line with a live URL | ||
* Citable References used in the "References" slide listed using the [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/16/ch15/ch15_sec009.html Chicago Manual of Style citation guidelines] | * Citable References used in the "References" slide listed using the [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/16/ch15/ch15_sec009.html Chicago Manual of Style citation guidelines] | ||
+ | |||
+ | === 5. Voiceover script included for slides common to all modules (Title, Overview, etc.) === | ||
+ | * [[Voiceover Script | See Voiceover Script page]] |
Revision as of 11:01, March 15, 2012
Back to the main data management training page
Back to the Authors Guide page
Module Review Criteria
1. Module successfully addresses the Target Audience who is a Researcher / Scientist and
- Is the data creator focused on the concepts within the data
- Is the team member who just needs to know enough about data management to pass on the data to be stored / archived
- Is the person who best knows the conceptual focus and context
- Is the person motivated by use and re-use of the data (their own, if not others)
- Is also a non-expert user of the data, geared to the undergraduate or general college level
- Is considered to be part of the ESIP community
- Is not the data manager who needs to receive, store, and archive the data and its context
- Is not the data curator who must place this data within the collections of the data center
- Is not the data librarian who helps others find, render, and use the data
2. Module has Conceptual Integrity
- Concepts discussed match the overall topic
- Concepts discussed fit where the topic is placed,
- e.g., specifics of "Backing up your data" fit within "Managing your data" framework
- Concepts discussed succinctly and accurately
- Concepts covered completely within timeframe of 3 - 7 minutes for review or presentation
- Links to other modules / topics are logical and accurate
3. Expression of concepts is appropriate and eye-catching
- Concepts conveyed simply
- Concepts described understandably
- Illustrations and/or humor used effectively and liberally
- Imagery used appropriately, and cited to an openly available source
- Jargon terms used sparingly
- When used, jargon terms explained succinctly
4. Module template followed
- Title slide contains the name of the section header in the "Module Template" field
- Title slide contains the name of the module in the "Subtitle" field
- Author names and organizations follow the proper form See Authors Guide -- Module cover page
- Total number of slides is between 5 and 10
- Any URLs included are relevant, live and accurate
- Resources listed on the "Resource" slide include a single phrase or short sentence explanation followed on the next line with a live URL
- Citable References used in the "References" slide listed using the Chicago Manual of Style citation guidelines