Difference between revisions of "The EMEP monitoring strategy 2004-2009"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* Need monitoring in rural and background areas as well as urban | * Need monitoring in rural and background areas as well as urban | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:CitedDoc]] |
Revision as of 21:02, October 20, 2009
< GEO User Requirements for Air Quality | Report | Documents | Resources | Edit with Form
Doc #: 6
Title: The EMEP monitoring strategy 2004-2009 | Document Link
Organization/Author: NILU
Type: "Regional Report" is not in the list (Report, Workshop, Paper, Website, Presentation, Legislation, Other) of allowed values for the "DocType" property.Regional Report
Year: 2003
Region: Europe
Observation Type:
Observation Needs:
Document Status: Submitted, 2009/04/30
Parameters: Pm10, PM2.5, O3, Nox, So2, Cl-1, NH3, VOC
Description of Document: EMEP stategy, , emission data measurement, air quality monitoring, air chemistry modeling, integrated assessment modeling
Needs:
- For all params monitoring is less tahn satisfactory in the Mediterranean and in Eastern Europe. For Central, Western Northern Europe the situation is better but still needs PM, POPs and VOCs
Challenges:
- Useful to have monitoring sites in N. Africa, Eastern Mediterranean region - covering areas not in Europe boundaries.
- Need multi-purpose monitoring sites
- Need monitoring in rural and background areas as well as urban
