Difference between revisions of "Talk:NSF Air Quality Observatory:AQ Observatory Proposal"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
('Win-theme' for the AQ Observatory project) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I would propose the 'win-theme' for the project to go like this: | I would propose the 'win-theme' for the project to go like this: | ||
| − | + | :There is already a solid data access/use infrastructure for AQ data - DataFed | |
| − | + | ::There is already a solid data access/use infrastructure for met data - Unidata | |
| − | + | ::Each serves their respective communities well, but not the sister communities | |
| − | + | ::So, the AQO will leverage these working infrastructures and augemnts them by: | |
| − | + | :::xtending DataFed and Unidata by making them interoperable at catalog, access and tools level | |
| − | + | :::dd new components that arise from fusing the two infrastructure domains | |
| − | + | :::courages networking by inclusion of other major nodes | |
| + | [[User:Rhusar|Rhusar]] | ||
Revision as of 15:52, January 19, 2006
| Links to: AQO Proposal Main Page > Proposal | Proposal Discussion| NSF Solicitation | NSF Solicitation Discussion | People |
|
This page contains discussion on various aspects of the proposal.
'Win-theme' for the AQ Observatory project
I would propose the 'win-theme' for the project to go like this:
- There is already a solid data access/use infrastructure for AQ data - DataFed
- There is already a solid data access/use infrastructure for met data - Unidata
- Each serves their respective communities well, but not the sister communities
- So, the AQO will leverage these working infrastructures and augemnts them by:
- xtending DataFed and Unidata by making them interoperable at catalog, access and tools level
- dd new components that arise from fusing the two infrastructure domains
- courages networking by inclusion of other major nodes
