Difference between revisions of "Talk:NSF Air Quality Observatory:AQ Observatory Proposal"

Revision as of 15:50, January 19, 2006

Links to: AQO Proposal Main Page > Proposal | Proposal Discussion| NSF Solicitation | NSF Solicitation Discussion | People

To add to the discussion, log in to DataFed wiki
Begin each entry with ====Username: Subject====
To respond, add dots ====......Username: Subject====
Indent response text by adding : for each tab.
Sign your entry by ending with '~~~~',

This page contains discussion on various aspects of the proposal.

'Win-theme' for the AQ Observatory project

I would propose the 'win-theme' for the project to go like this:

 - There is already a solid data access/use infrastructure for AQ data - DataFed 
 - There is already a solid data access/use infrastructure for met data - Unidata
 - Each serves their respective communities well, but not the sister communities 
 - So, the AQO will leverage these working infrastructures and augemnts them by:
     - Extending DataFed and Unidata by making them interoperable at catalog, access and tools level 
     - Add new components that arise from fusing the two infrastructure domains    
     - Ecourages networking by inclusion of other major nodes

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 This page contains discussion on various aspects of the proposal.
+== 'Win-theme' for the AQ Observatory project ==
+I would propose the 'win-theme' for the project to go like this:
+  - There is already a solid data access/use infrastructure for AQ data - DataFed
+  - There is already a solid data access/use infrastructure for met data - Unidata
+  - Each serves their respective communities well, but not the sister communities
+  - So, the AQO will leverage these working infrastructures and augemnts them by:
+      - Extending DataFed and Unidata by making them interoperable at catalog, access and tools level
+      - Add new components that arise from fusing the two infrastructure domains
+      - Ecourages networking by inclusion of other major nodes