Difference between revisions of "P&S Data Quality"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
m |
m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Quality control | :Quality control | ||
::Error bar | ::Error bar | ||
| + | ::Missing data | ||
::Contamination (weather, clouds) | ::Contamination (weather, clouds) | ||
::Instrument error | ::Instrument error | ||
::Cross instrument consistency | ::Cross instrument consistency | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Quality assurance (someone tags it as valid) | ||
| + | ::Useful metadata provided? | ||
::Subjective scaling (e.g. quality judgement with range 0-5) | ::Subjective scaling (e.g. quality judgement with range 0-5) | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | :Instrument Verification and Validation | |
| + | |||
* What common data quality standards can the Federation offer within the Earth Information Exchange? | * What common data quality standards can the Federation offer within the Earth Information Exchange? | ||
* What 3rd party ratings can we support? | * What 3rd party ratings can we support? | ||
| + | ::NCDC Certified data (only states that it is in the archive) | ||
| + | ::DIF records have some minimum required fields to accept; then have a text field to describe quality | ||
| + | |||
| + | * How can we enforce these standards within the Earth Information Exchange? | ||
* Are there similar ratings for "data services"? | * Are there similar ratings for "data services"? | ||
Revision as of 16:00, March 28, 2006
Back to: Products and Services
Discussion from March 28, 2006
What dimensions of quality should be considered?
- Quality control
- Error bar
- Missing data
- Contamination (weather, clouds)
- Instrument error
- Cross instrument consistency
- Quality assurance (someone tags it as valid)
- Useful metadata provided?
- Subjective scaling (e.g. quality judgement with range 0-5)
- Instrument Verification and Validation
- What common data quality standards can the Federation offer within the Earth Information Exchange?
- What 3rd party ratings can we support?
- NCDC Certified data (only states that it is in the archive)
- DIF records have some minimum required fields to accept; then have a text field to describe quality
- How can we enforce these standards within the Earth Information Exchange?
- Are there similar ratings for "data services"?
