Difference between revisions of "ISO Rationale"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(→Yes) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==ESIP Response== | ==ESIP Response== | ||
===Yes=== | ===Yes=== | ||
| − | Henry GZS DISC | + | *Henry GZS DISC |
| − | Daniel Jacob | + | *Daniel Jacob |
| − | Gao Chen | + | *Gao Chen |
| − | Xing | + | *Xing |
| − | Ed Armstrong | + | *Ed Armstrong |
| − | Discover | + | *Discover - Deborah Smith |
| − | Rudy Husar | + | *Rudy Husar |
| − | Ken Casey - not just "why" but "what" was done and when | + | *Ken Casey - not just "why" but "what" was done and when |
[[Category: ISO Metadata]] | [[Category: ISO Metadata]] | ||
Revision as of 10:11, July 18, 2008
How ISO Does It
Understanding the processing of datasets is critical to understanding their accuracy and applicability for certain tasks. The FGDC Standard provides a framework for tracking process steps that are applied to a dataset. The ISO Standard builds on that framework by adding a rationale element that allows processors to explain why process steps were done.
LI_ProcessStep
+ description : CharacterString
+ rationale [0..1] : CharacterString
+ dateTime [0..1] : DateTime
+ processor [0..*] : CI_ResponsibleParty
+ source [0..*]: LI_Source
ESIP Response
Yes
- Henry GZS DISC
- Daniel Jacob
- Gao Chen
- Ed Armstrong
- Discover - Deborah Smith
- Rudy Husar
- Ken Casey - not just "why" but "what" was done and when
