Difference between revisions of "ISO Feature Reports"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(New page: ==How ISO Does It== The ISO Standard include three types of data quality reports. The QE_CoverageResult (from ISO 19115-2) is a new report type that allows a quality result to be expresse...) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
+ resultFile [1]: MX_DataFile<br> | + resultFile [1]: MX_DataFile<br> | ||
+ resultFormat [1]: MD_format<br> | + resultFormat [1]: MD_format<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==ESIP Response== | ||
+ | *Ken Casey - not sure what this means | ||
+ | *Jeff Arnfield - spatial datasets over time are themselves a form of quality measure if one seeks / values a stable in-situ platform for observations | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===No=== | ||
+ | *Daniel Jacob | ||
+ | ===Maybe=== | ||
+ | *Rudy Husar | ||
[[Category: ISO Metadata]] | [[Category: ISO Metadata]] |
Revision as of 10:59, July 18, 2008
How ISO Does It
The ISO Standard include three types of data quality reports. The QE_CoverageResult (from ISO 19115-2) is a new report type that allows a quality result to be expressed as a spatial object. For example, if a gridded dataset has an associated grid of quality flags, that quality grid could be described here. Note also that the coverage results have an associated file and format.
QE_CoverageResult
+ spatialRepresentationType: vector, grid, textTable, tin, stereoModel, video
+ resultFile [1]: MX_DataFile
+ resultFormat [1]: MD_format
ESIP Response
- Ken Casey - not sure what this means
- Jeff Arnfield - spatial datasets over time are themselves a form of quality measure if one seeks / values a stable in-situ platform for observations
No
- Daniel Jacob
Maybe
- Rudy Husar