Difference between revisions of "Data Stewardship Alliance"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(Reverted edits by Erinmr (talk) to last revision by Ted.Habermann)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
We clearly need some improvement. Please let one of the conveners know if you have an idea - or add it here!
 
We clearly need some improvement. Please let one of the conveners know if you have an idea - or add it here!
 
== Notes from the Session ==
 
 
* Distinctions between ESIP and the Alliance
 
** relies less on volunteering and more on staffing
 
* The problem
 
** despite significant agreement on standards, data consistency remains elusive
 
** Stewardship capabilities are unnecessarily varied and reflect too few economies of scale
 
** Agencies and others face growing pressures
 
* The opportunity
 
** An alliance focused on stewardship aiding services and tools could reduce the problem
 
** Benefits could include training and support, advancement or capabilities, and more interagency cooperation
 
* Now is the time in the technology cycle to address the problem
 
* Other needs
 
** Improving services that foster interoperability
 
** training for data providers
 
** Widely accepted norms and better methodologies for citation
 
** More meaningful methods of data-object exchange
 
* Forming an alliance can address common needs and problems
 
** There is power in forming a community of practice - people who use the same terminology and tools
 
* Seeking feedback
 
** Affirming the merits of cooperation, community-centric activities
 
* Revenue model
 
** Core activities that focus on the common good, balanced by activities for specific individuals
 
* Motivations for joining "StewarDIS"
 
** Access to support services that aid in data creation and stewardship
 
** Training, software, etc.
 
** Membership in a community of practice where these same priorities are valued
 
** Faster advancement of the stewardship capabilities
 
* Setting the stage for evaluation
 
** Situation or environment
 
** Inputs, outputs and activities
 
** Outcomes
 
** Assumptions
 

Latest revision as of 00:27, July 27, 2012

Conveners

  1. David Fulker, UCAR/Emeritus & OPeNDAP Board
  2. Ted Habermann, NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC
  3. Mohan Ramamurthy, UCAR/Unidata

Abstract

In this session we engage participants in discussing the merits and nature of a potential data-stewardship alliance—as yet only in its conceptual stage—premised on the basis of broad, cross-agency needs for support services and tools that foster interoperability and address other data-creation and data-provision problems.

A tentative mission for the Alliance is: Supporting the community in creating, publishing and stewarding meaningful earth & space data for world-wide, cross-disciplinary discovery, use and citation.

We set the stage by outlining the nature of the problem and a possible solution, capitalizing on the conveners’ experiences with the Unidata Program as an example of how common tools and services can foster a sense of community and support the common good. We put forth a number of “straw-man” characteristics for the proposed alliance, intending that they stimulate debate, discussion and/or eventual agreement on the value and timeliness of the concept.

Looking for a Great Acronym

Every great idea needs a great acronym.

Our current idea is SADIS: Stewardship Alliance for Data-Intensive Science

We clearly need some improvement. Please let one of the conveners know if you have an idea - or add it here!