Difference between revisions of "2006-07-30 GEOSS User V - AQ Data Systems"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
===Challenges=== | ===Challenges=== | ||
====..Human Factors==== | ====..Human Factors==== | ||
− | : The 4 C's: Communication, Cooperation, | + | : The 4 C's: Communication, Coordination, Cooperation, Competion, Coopetition |
− | : Attracting user participation | + | : Attracting user participation |
+ | |||
====..Architecture==== | ====..Architecture==== | ||
: Maximize the 'Network Effect'.... | : Maximize the 'Network Effect'.... |
Revision as of 08:51, June 23, 2006
.
Current and Near Future AQ Information System of Systems
..Current Situation
- Few users; limited, sporadic data/model; poor integration; Dedicated 'Stove Pipe' Systems -> Stiff and limited decision support
..Near Furure
- Diverse users, More sensory/model data-GEOSS; Extensive integration and 'mashing'-Web 2.0; Network effect ->Responsive decisin support
..Paper purpose and outline
- Community assessment of AQ IT; User feedback to GEOSS Architecture; Aid to agency planners
AQ Data System Architectures
..User-Driven: User Drives Design
..Distributed: Structure Extends over Many Dimensions
..Loosely Couppled: Software Components, System of Systems, Architcture of Participation
Information Technologies
..Software Components: Data as Service, Web Services
..Interoperability Technologies: Standards/Conventions, Wrappers and Adopters, Workflow Engines
..Web 2.0 Technologies: Searching, Tagging, RSS, AJAX ...
Challenges
..Human Factors
- The 4 C's: Communication, Coordination, Cooperation, Competion, Coopetition
- Attracting user participation
..Architecture
- Maximize the 'Network Effect'....
..Technologies
- Grasping and harnessing Web 2.0