Module Review Criteria
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Revision as of 08:26, March 8, 2012 by Nhoebelheinrich (talk | contribs)
Back to the main data management training page
Back to the Authors Guide page
When your module is reviewed, here are the criteria the reviewers will be using...
The module should be well-formed (i.e., follow the guidelines above) The content is balanced in that it should be concise, yet simultaneously both accurate and complete The references should be relevant and any URL's should work The content should be geared to a non-expert yet undergraduate or general college level audience The content should be simple and understandable by that audience Jargon and data management terminology (e.g., data set, granule, etc.) needs to be defined or avoided Imagery should be appropriate to the topic and either openly available or appropriately cited