Governance
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Revision as of 15:05, October 15, 2008 by Carolbmeyer (talk | contribs)
Back to Main ESIP page
Back to Implementation Groups
Subgroup Members:
- Rob Raskin
- Chuck Hutchinson
- Bruce Caron
Issues to Be Addressed:
- Permanently Name Alternate Voting Reps for which no proxy is needed – education and communication are key parts toward the successful implementation of this;
- What to do with Community Engagement, Commercial Development & Products and Services Committees; look at all committee charters
- Clusters lifespan – related to membership; finance; AQ was never envisioned to short term; perhaps more appropriate for AQ Cluster to be a WG
- Membership dues
- Leadership succession/terms/when elections are held
- Governance should support strategic plan... meetings should support governance structure
Discussion:
- Permanently Name Alternate Voting Reps for which no proxy is needed – education and communication are key parts toward the successful implementation of this
- Is there an issue?
- What would be required to make the change? Look at Bylaw II.2.3 - get clarification from C&B
- Resolution from Excom articulating the policy change
- Primary and Secondary alternates would have to be named
- What to do with Community Engagement, Commercial Development & Products and Services Committees; look at all committee charters
- Active committees - Education/IT&I are more self-serving; Inactive committees have larger organizational roles
- Committee activity review: # of telecons/meetings; # of active people
- Are committee functions related to ESIP Types?
- Eliminate committees that are inactive - would require bylaws changes
- Open process to invite new committee to be formed