Difference between revisions of "AQ Community Meeting Summer 2009 Schedule"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[July_7-10%2C_2009%2C_ESIP_Federation_Meeting%2C_Santa_Barbara%2C_CA|Main Summer 2009 Meeting Page]] >> [[Air Quality Community Summer 2009 Meeting]]</small> | [[July_7-10%2C_2009%2C_ESIP_Federation_Meeting%2C_Santa_Barbara%2C_CA|Main Summer 2009 Meeting Page]] >> [[Air Quality Community Summer 2009 Meeting]]</small> | ||
|}<br /> | |}<br /> | ||
− | ==Working Agenda, where we are== | + | ==Working Agenda, where we are...add your comments her== |
This is not final. Some remaining concerns: | This is not final. Some remaining concerns: | ||
− | + | # Does it give OAQPS enough time for feedback etc.''LS:added more time for discussion in block 2''? | |
− | + | # I'd like an explicit slot for the Non-AQ folks (Josh Lieberman, Raj Singh). | |
− | + | # We will stay flexible about adding a few more folks to Wednesday presentations | |
+ | # your comment... | ||
+ | # | ||
+ | # | ||
+ | # | ||
==Format for Wed Presenters== | ==Format for Wed Presenters== |
Revision as of 16:50, June 19, 2009
Main ESIP page >> Main AQ WG page
Main Summer 2009 Meeting Page >> Air Quality Community Summer 2009 Meeting |
Working Agenda, where we are...add your comments her
This is not final. Some remaining concerns:
- Does it give OAQPS enough time for feedback etc.LS:added more time for discussion in block 2?
- I'd like an explicit slot for the Non-AQ folks (Josh Lieberman, Raj Singh).
- We will stay flexible about adding a few more folks to Wednesday presentations
- your comment...
Format for Wed Presenters
We'll be contacting proposed presenters, here are proposed talking points for presenters (we'll ask presenters to limit presentations to 10min and address whichever 3 of the following 5 points seem most relevant):
- What user needs are you especially focused on now?
- What externally re-usable services you are working to offer now or plan/aspire to offer in the future?
- What service(s) do you wish were available now from others? What would you do with them?
- What common infrastructure do you think is most needed to improve flows and utilization of AQ data?
- What specific barriers to establishing this common infrastructure?
The entire meeting will be accessible remotely. We will use WebEx (or something similar). (Previous discussion was of a video conference; we will use WebEx instead.) Some presenters will use remote access and feedback on the agenda is welcome even if you won't be there in person.
Block | Time | Subject | Presenter |
Block 1 | 1:00 | Welcome, Objectives, Proposed Approach | Sweeny |
…for quick briefing sessions, take clarifying questions, hold discussion till end | |||
Goals & Policy Overview | 1:15 | GEO Perspective | Friedl |
Weds. Afternoon | 1:30 | OAQPS perspective | Scheffe |
1:45 | EPA GEO perspective | Young | |
2:00 | NASA | Hilsenrath | |
2:15 | USGEO | Lindsay | |
2:30 | ESIP AQ | Falke | |
2:45 | room for one more? | ||
3:00 | BREAK | ||
---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
For following sessions take down questions and review together at the end | |||
Block 2 | 3:30 | AIP AQ infrastructure | Robinson |
Technical & Strategic Happenings | Ross Report* | Sweeny* | |
OAQPS strategy* | Mintz* | ||
Weds. Afternoon | EPA Earth* | Young* | |
*Above three talks could be combined or shortened | |||
VIEWS & CMAS | Schichtel, McClure, or Shankar | ||
HTAP Network | Husar | ||
5:00 | Review questions and start discussion on cross-cutting theames | Sweeny | |
5:30 | Recess | ||
---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
Block 3 | 9:00 | Funding Agency Perspectives on User Needs and Agency Roles | Sweeny & Panel: Friedl, Scheffe, McCabe, Husar, Falke |
Common Themes, Needs/Opportunities | |||
Thurs. Morning | 9:30 | Brainstorm and discussion on areas of interest and opportunity from Day 1 themes... Gaps? Use Cases? | |
10:00 | Break | ||
---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
Block 4 | 10:30 | Facilitated Discussion | Sweeny |
Barriers and Practical Progress | What are barriers that prevent us from achieving those opportunities? | ||
Thurs. Morning | Walk through how concrete progress could occur in some example areas - what incentives/connections/infrastructure are needed? | ||
Generate examples of real improvements that could be made, to make systems interoperate | |||
12:30 | Lunch | ||
---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
Block 5 | 2:00 | Review of AM discussion and ID of key issues/opportunities/actions | |
Review of AM | |||
Thurs. Afternoon | |||
Block 6 | 2:30 | An opportunity for the community to offer feedback on the GCI, the architecture of GEOSS, and the process and priorities for GEO and USGEO | Friedl, Young, Lindsay |
Feedback for USGEO and GEO | |||
Thurs. Afternoon | |||
tbd | Break | ||
---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
Block 7 | tbd + 20 | Where does ESIP-AQ go next, over the next 4 months / 1 year? How do we build the Community of Practice and reach out, nationally and internationally, to capitilize on these opportunities? What concrete activities should the CoP take on? | |
Where does ESIP-AQ go next? | |||
Thurs. Afternoon | |||
5:30 | Adjourn | ||
Agenda in Excel and Prior Versions
This version in excel:
Previous version of this in Excel is here (.xls)
The previous version is here (.xls)