Difference between revisions of "AQ Community Meeting Summer 2009 Schedule"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
[[July_7-10%2C_2009%2C_ESIP_Federation_Meeting%2C_Santa_Barbara%2C_CA|Main Summer 2009 Meeting Page]] >> [[Air Quality Community Summer 2009 Meeting]]</small>
 
[[July_7-10%2C_2009%2C_ESIP_Federation_Meeting%2C_Santa_Barbara%2C_CA|Main Summer 2009 Meeting Page]] >> [[Air Quality Community Summer 2009 Meeting]]</small>
 
|}<br />
 
|}<br />
==Working Agenda, where we are==
+
==Working Agenda, where we are...add your comments her==
 
This is not final.  Some remaining concerns:
 
This is not final.  Some remaining concerns:
* Does it give OAQPS enough time for feedback etc.''LS:added more time for discussion in block 2''?
+
# Does it give OAQPS enough time for feedback etc.''LS:added more time for discussion in block 2''?
* I'd like an explicit slot for the Non-AQ folks (Josh Lieberman, Raj Singh).
+
# I'd like an explicit slot for the Non-AQ folks (Josh Lieberman, Raj Singh).
* We will stay flexible about adding a few more folks to Wednesday presentations
+
# We will stay flexible about adding a few more folks to Wednesday presentations
 +
# your comment...
 +
#
 +
#
 +
#
  
 
==Format for Wed Presenters==
 
==Format for Wed Presenters==

Revision as of 16:50, June 19, 2009

Main ESIP page >> Main AQ WG page

Main Summer 2009 Meeting Page >> Air Quality Community Summer 2009 Meeting


Working Agenda, where we are...add your comments her

This is not final. Some remaining concerns:

  1. Does it give OAQPS enough time for feedback etc.LS:added more time for discussion in block 2?
  2. I'd like an explicit slot for the Non-AQ folks (Josh Lieberman, Raj Singh).
  3. We will stay flexible about adding a few more folks to Wednesday presentations
  4. your comment...

Format for Wed Presenters

We'll be contacting proposed presenters, here are proposed talking points for presenters (we'll ask presenters to limit presentations to 10min and address whichever 3 of the following 5 points seem most relevant):

  1. What user needs are you especially focused on now?
  2. What externally re-usable services you are working to offer now or plan/aspire to offer in the future?
  3. What service(s) do you wish were available now from others? What would you do with them?
  4. What common infrastructure do you think is most needed to improve flows and utilization of AQ data?
  5. What specific barriers to establishing this common infrastructure?


The entire meeting will be accessible remotely. We will use WebEx (or something similar). (Previous discussion was of a video conference; we will use WebEx instead.) Some presenters will use remote access and feedback on the agenda is welcome even if you won't be there in person.

Block Time Subject Presenter
Block 1 1:00 Welcome, Objectives, Proposed Approach Sweeny
…for quick briefing sessions, take clarifying questions, hold discussion till end
Goals & Policy Overview 1:15 GEO Perspective Friedl
Weds. Afternoon 1:30 OAQPS perspective Scheffe
1:45 EPA GEO perspective Young
2:00 NASA Hilsenrath
2:15 USGEO Lindsay
2:30 ESIP AQ Falke
2:45 room for one more?
3:00 BREAK
---------- ------ ------------------------ -------------
For following sessions take down questions and review together at the end
Block 2 3:30 AIP AQ infrastructure Robinson
Technical & Strategic Happenings Ross Report* Sweeny*
OAQPS strategy* Mintz*
Weds. Afternoon EPA Earth* Young*
*Above three talks could be combined or shortened
VIEWS & CMAS Schichtel, McClure, or Shankar
HTAP Network Husar
5:00 Review questions and start discussion on cross-cutting theames Sweeny
5:30 Recess
---------- ------ ------------------------ -------------
Block 3 9:00 Funding Agency Perspectives on User Needs and Agency Roles Sweeny & Panel: Friedl, Scheffe, McCabe, Husar, Falke
Common Themes, Needs/Opportunities
Thurs. Morning 9:30 Brainstorm and discussion on areas of interest and opportunity from Day 1 themes... Gaps? Use Cases?
10:00 Break
---------- ------ ------------------------ -------------
Block 4 10:30 Facilitated Discussion Sweeny
Barriers and Practical Progress What are barriers that prevent us from achieving those opportunities?
Thurs. Morning Walk through how concrete progress could occur in some example areas - what incentives/connections/infrastructure are needed?
Generate examples of real improvements that could be made, to make systems interoperate
12:30 Lunch
---------- ------ ------------------------ -------------
Block 5 2:00 Review of AM discussion and ID of key issues/opportunities/actions
Review of AM
Thurs. Afternoon
Block 6 2:30 An opportunity for the community to offer feedback on the GCI, the architecture of GEOSS, and the process and priorities for GEO and USGEO Friedl, Young, Lindsay
Feedback for USGEO and GEO
Thurs. Afternoon
tbd Break
---------- ------ ------------------------ -------------
Block 7 tbd + 20 Where does ESIP-AQ go next, over the next 4 months / 1 year? How do we build the Community of Practice and reach out, nationally and internationally, to capitilize on these opportunities? What concrete activities should the CoP take on?
Where does ESIP-AQ go next?
Thurs. Afternoon
5:30 Adjourn

Agenda in Excel and Prior Versions

This version in excel:

Previous version of this in Excel is here (.xls)

The previous version is here (.xls)