Difference between revisions of "Data Value Chain Diagram....Draft for your comments"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Image:DATA VALUE CHAIN rev2.gif|600px]]<br> | [[Image:DATA VALUE CHAIN rev2.gif|600px]]<br> | ||
| − | ===Scheffe Comment[[User:Rscheffe|Rscheffe]]=== | + | ===Scheffe Comment -- [[User:Rscheffe|Rscheffe]]=== |
Louis, this is good...I would remove modeling from the B2 integration area...conceptually you are ciorrect...taht is...it takes raw information to drive models...a postprocessing of sorts...but in this community we are treating modeled output as a "eaw" data source comparable to measurements...and, the reality is that the modeling | Louis, this is good...I would remove modeling from the B2 integration area...conceptually you are ciorrect...taht is...it takes raw information to drive models...a postprocessing of sorts...but in this community we are treating modeled output as a "eaw" data source comparable to measurements...and, the reality is that the modeling | ||
systems have faily specific programs that perform the necessary prepartions of emissions, meterological and air quality data....I would just call just call it aggregation and integration...(processing is often thought of as the more downstrem efforts...) also...need to perhaps shade the area left of decision making to emphasize focus of this meeting....not that imporatnt | systems have faily specific programs that perform the necessary prepartions of emissions, meterological and air quality data....I would just call just call it aggregation and integration...(processing is often thought of as the more downstrem efforts...) also...need to perhaps shade the area left of decision making to emphasize focus of this meeting....not that imporatnt | ||
| − | ===Husar Comment [[User:Rhusar|Rhusar]] | + | ===Husar Comment -- [[User:Rhusar|Rhusar]] === |
[[Image:DATA VALUE CHAIN rev2R.png|600px]] | [[Image:DATA VALUE CHAIN rev2R.png|600px]] | ||
Revision as of 13:22, February 5, 2008
< Back to Data Summit Workspace
Please provide your comments to louis.sweeny@ross-assoc.com
Scheffe Comment -- rich scheffe (Rscheffe)
Louis, this is good...I would remove modeling from the B2 integration area...conceptually you are ciorrect...taht is...it takes raw information to drive models...a postprocessing of sorts...but in this community we are treating modeled output as a "eaw" data source comparable to measurements...and, the reality is that the modeling systems have faily specific programs that perform the necessary prepartions of emissions, meterological and air quality data....I would just call just call it aggregation and integration...(processing is often thought of as the more downstrem efforts...) also...need to perhaps shade the area left of decision making to emphasize focus of this meeting....not that imporatnt
Husar Comment -- Rhusar
