Difference between revisions of "HowardBurrows"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
==use case question==
 
I received your question/comments. You can go ahead and review any of the use cases that are online. I am still in the process of converting and uploading the remainder. I have no problem with the renaming, but this is probably an issue that we want to bring before the working group next week.
 
 
Karl
 
 
 
==wiki problem==
 
==wiki problem==
 
Howard,
 
Howard,
Line 19: Line 14:
 
Can you help explain what's going on?
 
Can you help explain what's going on?
  
  -- Brian
+
-- Brian
 +
 
 +
::We had a problem when users were accessing the wiki from two different URLs that shared the same wiki database objects.  This has been fixed by eliminating the redundant URL. Please use only [[http://wiki.esipfed.org]] and its derivatives from now on.
 +
 
 +
==use case question==
 +
I received your question/comments. You can go ahead and review any of the use cases that are online. I am still in the process of converting and uploading the remainder. I have no problem with the renaming, but this is probably an issue that we want to bring before the working group next week.
 +
 
 +
-- Karl
 +
 
 +
::This was an early test of the use of the discussion page.  Query answered directly.

Revision as of 15:48, April 20, 2006

wiki problem

Howard,

Many of the links on the wiki are currently broken. It appears that someone reorganized the wiki so that all URL's need to have the path "/wiki" after the "http://www.esipfed.org". However, many of the existing pages don't have that in their path so they are currently "not found".

In particular, the "Web Services" link and many of the links below it are now "not found".

Can you help explain what's going on?

-- Brian

We had a problem when users were accessing the wiki from two different URLs that shared the same wiki database objects. This has been fixed by eliminating the redundant URL. Please use only [[1]] and its derivatives from now on.

use case question

I received your question/comments. You can go ahead and review any of the use cases that are online. I am still in the process of converting and uploading the remainder. I have no problem with the renaming, but this is probably an issue that we want to bring before the working group next week.

-- Karl

This was an early test of the use of the discussion page. Query answered directly.