Difference between revisions of "P&S Data Quality"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
m |
m |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
===3rd party ratings=== | ===3rd party ratings=== | ||
| − | ::NCDC Certified data (only states that it is in the archive) | + | ::NCDC |
| − | ::DIF records have some minimum required fields to accept | + | :::NCDC Certified data (only states that it is in the archive) |
| + | ::GCMD | ||
| + | :::DIF records have some minimum required fields to accept | ||
| + | :::then have a text field to describe quality | ||
| + | ::ECHO has "measured parameters" from ECS model | ||
| + | :::QA percent cloud cover; missing pixels; | ||
| + | ::CLASS/Climate Data Record | ||
| + | :::Maturity Model approach for data (John Bates) | ||
| + | :::Level of maturity (five levels of improved treatment) | ||
| + | ::FGDC | ||
| + | :::Whole section on quality, text only | ||
::Testimonials | ::Testimonials | ||
::Peer review | ::Peer review | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Additional Questions=== | ===Additional Questions=== | ||
Revision as of 15:24, March 28, 2006
Back to: Products and Services
Discussion from March 28, 2006
What dimensions of quality should be considered?
- Quality control
- Error bar
- Missing data
- Contamination (weather, clouds)
- Instrument error (recalibration)
- stability
- Cross instrument consistency
- Quality assurance (someone tags it as valid)
- Useful metadata provided?
- Subjective scaling (e.g. quality judgement with range 0-5)
- Instrument Verification and Validation
- Data processing
- Re-processing tag and notification
- input errors and forcings
- re-gridding
- missing data
- Usage issues
- High enough resolution?
- Valid inference about what is measured
- Chain of Custody (for legal use)
Strategic breakdown
- Instrument (accuracy, completeness, consistency)
- Environment (cloud)
- Processing
3rd party ratings
- NCDC
- NCDC Certified data (only states that it is in the archive)
- GCMD
- DIF records have some minimum required fields to accept
- then have a text field to describe quality
- ECHO has "measured parameters" from ECS model
- QA percent cloud cover; missing pixels;
- CLASS/Climate Data Record
- Maturity Model approach for data (John Bates)
- Level of maturity (five levels of improved treatment)
- FGDC
- Whole section on quality, text only
- Testimonials
- Peer review
- NCDC
Additional Questions
- What common data quality standards can the Federation offer within the Earth Information Exchange?
- How can we enforce these standards within the Earth Information Exchange?
- Are there similar ratings for "data services"?
