Difference between revisions of "AQ Community Meeting Summer 2009 Schedule"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[July_7-10%2C_2009%2C_ESIP_Federation_Meeting%2C_Santa_Barbara%2C_CA|Main Summer 2009 Meeting Page]] >> [[Air Quality Community Summer 2009 Meeting]]</small> | [[July_7-10%2C_2009%2C_ESIP_Federation_Meeting%2C_Santa_Barbara%2C_CA|Main Summer 2009 Meeting Page]] >> [[Air Quality Community Summer 2009 Meeting]]</small> | ||
|}<br /> | |}<br /> | ||
| − | == | + | ==Working Agenda, where we are== |
This is not final. Some remaining concerns: | This is not final. Some remaining concerns: | ||
| − | * Does it give OAQPS enough time for feedback etc.? | + | * Does it give OAQPS enough time for feedback etc.''LS:added more time for discussion in block 2''? |
* I'd like an explicit slot for the Non-AQ folks (Josh Lieberman, Raj Singh). | * I'd like an explicit slot for the Non-AQ folks (Josh Lieberman, Raj Singh). | ||
* We will stay flexible about adding a few more folks to Wednesday presentations | * We will stay flexible about adding a few more folks to Wednesday presentations | ||
| − | We'll be contacting proposed presenters | + | ==Format for Wed Presenters== |
| + | We'll be contacting proposed presenters, here are proposed talking points for presenters (we'll ask presenters to limit presentations to 10min and address whichever 3 of the following 5 points seem most relevant): | ||
| + | #What user needs are you especially focused on now? | ||
| + | #What externally re-usable services you are working to offer now or plan/aspire to offer in the future? | ||
| + | #What service(s) do you wish were available now from others? What would you do with them? | ||
| + | #What common infrastructure do you think is most needed to improve flows and utilization of AQ data? | ||
| + | #What specific barriers to establishing this common infrastructure? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
'''The entire meeting will be accessible remotely.''' We will use WebEx (or something similar). (Previous discussion was of a video conference; we will use WebEx instead.) Some presenters will use remote access and feedback on the agenda is welcome even if you won't be there in person. | '''The entire meeting will be accessible remotely.''' We will use WebEx (or something similar). (Previous discussion was of a video conference; we will use WebEx instead.) Some presenters will use remote access and feedback on the agenda is welcome even if you won't be there in person. | ||
| Line 122: | Line 125: | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | ==Agenda in Excel and Prior Versions== | ||
| + | This version in excel: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Previous version of this in Excel is [[Media:SB schedule B.xls|here]] (.xls) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The previous version is [[Media:SB schedule.xls|here]] (.xls) | ||
Revision as of 15:49, June 19, 2009
| Main ESIP page >> Main AQ WG page
Main Summer 2009 Meeting Page >> Air Quality Community Summer 2009 Meeting |
Working Agenda, where we are
This is not final. Some remaining concerns:
- Does it give OAQPS enough time for feedback etc.LS:added more time for discussion in block 2?
- I'd like an explicit slot for the Non-AQ folks (Josh Lieberman, Raj Singh).
- We will stay flexible about adding a few more folks to Wednesday presentations
Format for Wed Presenters
We'll be contacting proposed presenters, here are proposed talking points for presenters (we'll ask presenters to limit presentations to 10min and address whichever 3 of the following 5 points seem most relevant):
- What user needs are you especially focused on now?
- What externally re-usable services you are working to offer now or plan/aspire to offer in the future?
- What service(s) do you wish were available now from others? What would you do with them?
- What common infrastructure do you think is most needed to improve flows and utilization of AQ data?
- What specific barriers to establishing this common infrastructure?
The entire meeting will be accessible remotely. We will use WebEx (or something similar). (Previous discussion was of a video conference; we will use WebEx instead.) Some presenters will use remote access and feedback on the agenda is welcome even if you won't be there in person.
| Block | Time | Subject | Presenter |
| Block 1 | 1:00 | Welcome, Objectives, Proposed Approach | Sweeny |
| …for quick briefing sessions, take clarifying questions, hold discussion till end | |||
| Goals & Policy Overview | 1:15 | GEO Perspective | Friedl |
| Weds. Afternoon | 1:30 | OAQPS perspective | Scheffe |
| 1:45 | EPA GEO perspective | Young | |
| 2:00 | NASA | Hilsenrath | |
| 2:15 | USGEO | Lindsay | |
| 2:30 | ESIP AQ | Falke | |
| 2:45 | room for one more? | ||
| 3:00 | BREAK | ||
| ---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
| For following sessions take down questions and review together at the end | |||
| Block 2 | 3:30 | AIP AQ infrastructure | Robinson |
| Technical & Strategic Happenings | Ross Report* | Sweeny* | |
| OAQPS strategy* | Mintz* | ||
| Weds. Afternoon | EPA Earth* | Young* | |
| *Above three talks could be combined or shortened | |||
| VIEWS & CMAS | Schichtel, McClure, or Shankar | ||
| HTAP Network | Husar | ||
| 5:00 | Review questions and start discussion on cross-cutting theames | Sweeny | |
| 5:30 | Recess | ||
| ---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
| Block 3 | 9:00 | Funding Agency Perspectives on User Needs and Agency Roles | Sweeny & Panel: Friedl, Scheffe, McCabe, Husar, Falke |
| Common Themes, Needs/Opportunities | |||
| Thurs. Morning | 9:30 | Brainstorm and discussion on areas of interest and opportunity from Day 1 themes... Gaps? Use Cases? | |
| 10:00 | Break | ||
| ---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
| Block 4 | 10:30 | Facilitated Discussion | Sweeny |
| Barriers and Practical Progress | What are barriers that prevent us from achieving those opportunities? | ||
| Thurs. Morning | Walk through how concrete progress could occur in some example areas - what incentives/connections/infrastructure are needed? | ||
| Generate examples of real improvements that could be made, to make systems interoperate | |||
| 12:30 | Lunch | ||
| ---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
| Block 5 | 2:00 | Review of AM discussion and ID of key issues/opportunities/actions | |
| Review of AM | |||
| Thurs. Afternoon | |||
| Block 6 | 2:30 | An opportunity for the community to offer feedback on the GCI, the architecture of GEOSS, and the process and priorities for GEO and USGEO | Friedl, Young, Lindsay |
| Feedback for USGEO and GEO | |||
| Thurs. Afternoon | |||
| tbd | Break | ||
| ---------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------- |
| Block 7 | tbd + 20 | Where does ESIP-AQ go next, over the next 4 months / 1 year? How do we build the Community of Practice and reach out, nationally and internationally, to capitilize on these opportunities? What concrete activities should the CoP take on? | |
| Where does ESIP-AQ go next? | |||
| Thurs. Afternoon | |||
| 5:30 | Adjourn | ||
Agenda in Excel and Prior Versions
This version in excel:
Previous version of this in Excel is here (.xls)
The previous version is here (.xls)
