Difference between revisions of "March 25, 2011"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(Created page with "== Participants == *Gregory Leptoukh == Agenda == * Preparation for the Summer EIP Meeting in Santa Fe: [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Summer_2011_Meeting ESIP Summer 2...") |
(→Agenda) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Preparation for the Summer EIP Meeting in Santa Fe: [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Summer_2011_Meeting ESIP Summer 2011 Meeting] | * Preparation for the Summer EIP Meeting in Santa Fe: [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Summer_2011_Meeting ESIP Summer 2011 Meeting] | ||
** Speakers | ** Speakers | ||
− | *** Breakout sessions – how many? | + | *** Main topics to discuss at the summer meeting - which ones are the most important: |
+ | **** Terminology/taxonomy | ||
+ | **** Data Intercomparison and quality harmonization | ||
+ | **** Best practices in different communities | ||
+ | **** Fit-for-purpose criteria for data quality (e.g., climate change need vs. near-real-time monitoring need) | ||
+ | **** Level 2 Quality flags (and what do they tell about the product quality) | ||
+ | **** Level 3 "Quality" (what’s that?) | ||
+ | **** Propagation of L2 uncertainty to L3 | ||
+ | **** Effects of missing data on aggregates | ||
+ | **** Data quality ontology (The Semantic Web Cluster is already working on logistics of the Data Quality Ontology breakout session) | ||
+ | **** Presenting data quality to users | ||
+ | *** Breakout sessions – how many? | ||
*** Identify reps of various research and application communities for: | *** Identify reps of various research and application communities for: | ||
**** their understanding and requirements for quality | **** their understanding and requirements for quality |
Revision as of 09:16, March 25, 2011
Participants
- Gregory Leptoukh
Agenda
- Preparation for the Summer EIP Meeting in Santa Fe: ESIP Summer 2011 Meeting
- Speakers
- Main topics to discuss at the summer meeting - which ones are the most important:
- Terminology/taxonomy
- Data Intercomparison and quality harmonization
- Best practices in different communities
- Fit-for-purpose criteria for data quality (e.g., climate change need vs. near-real-time monitoring need)
- Level 2 Quality flags (and what do they tell about the product quality)
- Level 3 "Quality" (what’s that?)
- Propagation of L2 uncertainty to L3
- Effects of missing data on aggregates
- Data quality ontology (The Semantic Web Cluster is already working on logistics of the Data Quality Ontology breakout session)
- Presenting data quality to users
- Breakout sessions – how many?
- Identify reps of various research and application communities for:
- their understanding and requirements for quality
- methodology they use to assess and quantify data quality
- Main topics to discuss at the summer meeting - which ones are the most important:
- Communities:
- SST
- Ocean color
- Precipitation
- Atm Chemistry
- Land
- Modeling
- Speakers
- How and when for IQ telecons
- One main topic per telecon (presentation via WebEx)
- Every other Friday at 2:30 pm Eastern time (have been told that Fridays are on half hour somehow...
Action Items
- by Apr 1 identify potential speakers