Difference between revisions of "Vertical profiles, transport and removal"
(→Goals) |
|||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
===Data to look at=== | ===Data to look at=== | ||
| + | Objective: | ||
| + | Understanding of model diversity in spatial distribution and in removal processes | ||
| + | Evaluate simulated spatial distribution and processes with observations | ||
| + | Establish/quantify an acceptable diversity in global aerosol simulations | ||
| + | Find methods to evaluate process parameterisations | ||
| + | Define dedicated diagnostics of model results | ||
| + | Elaborate recommendations | ||
| + | Collect data for model evaluation (vertical profiles&processes) including uncertainty | ||
| + | |||
| + | This working group has a special focus on dust. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Specific scientific questions | ||
| + | - How realistic are the simulated (vertical and horizontal) spatial aerosol distributions? | ||
| + | - How to validate aerosol processes? | ||
| + | - Is the diversity of simulated vertical dispersal caused by differences in transport or by removal processes? | ||
| + | - How much complexity of aerosol models is necessary? | ||
| + | - more | ||
| + | |||
| + | Methods: | ||
| + | Document model parameterisations | ||
| + | Assemble observed vertical profiles to evaluate models | ||
| + | PBL vs. Troposphere, look at mesoscale models | ||
| + | Exchange modules (use in the same GCM, link to GMI) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Short-term actions/experiments: | ||
| + | Compare AeroCom data to observations | ||
| + | Redo simulation for 2003 with specific diagnostics | ||
| + | Passive tracer experiment (HTAP CO-experiments) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Data to look: | ||
| + | vertical distribution | ||
| + | ground-based networks: lidar backscatter (corrected), extinction ARM MPLNET EARLINET | ||
| + | satellites: GLASS, MISR?, CALIPSO | ||
| + | aircraft campaigns | ||
| + | |||
| + | horizontal distribution | ||
| + | station data (surf conc) networks | ||
| + | satellite data (e.g. on dust episodes to pin down horizontal transport) | ||
| + | |||
| + | processes | ||
| + | wet deposition of SO4? | ||
| + | ?? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Contact persons/experts | ||
| + | provide vertical profile LIDAR data: Rich Ferrare | ||
| + | CALIPSO: Dave Winker | ||
| + | MISR: Ralph Kahn | ||
| + | Access to AeroCom data base: Christiane Textor | ||
| + | Dust questions: Paul Ginoux | ||
| + | |||
| + | Specific tasks | ||
| + | Validate model results with observed vertical LIDAR profiles: Rich and Christiane | ||
Revision as of 14:17, October 31, 2006
AeroCom wiki discussion entry
Go back to AeroCom/Working group structure
See also summary of AeroCom/Recommendations
AeroCom working group Vertical profiles, transport and removal
Participants for analysis
Christiane Textor Paul Ginoux Rich Ferrare Ralph Kahn Oyvind Seeland Philippe Stier Dave Winker (&CALIPSO science team) Xhiahong Liu Dorothy Koch Trond Iverson Graham Mann Steve Ghan Mian Chin, Hiuisheng Bian (GMI) Michael Schulz more?
Participants for experiments
Goals
- Understanding of model diversity in spatial distribution and in removal processes
- Evaluate simulated spatial distribution and processes with observations
- Establish/quantify an acceptable diversity in global aerosol simulations
- Find methods to evaluate process parameterisations
- Define dedicated diagnostics of model results
- Elaborate recommendations
- Collect data for model evaluation (vertical profiles&processes) including uncertainty
- This working group has a special focus on dust.
Processes and possible Diagnostics
Short-term actions/experiments
Data to look at
Objective: Understanding of model diversity in spatial distribution and in removal processes Evaluate simulated spatial distribution and processes with observations Establish/quantify an acceptable diversity in global aerosol simulations Find methods to evaluate process parameterisations Define dedicated diagnostics of model results Elaborate recommendations Collect data for model evaluation (vertical profiles&processes) including uncertainty
This working group has a special focus on dust.
Specific scientific questions - How realistic are the simulated (vertical and horizontal) spatial aerosol distributions? - How to validate aerosol processes? - Is the diversity of simulated vertical dispersal caused by differences in transport or by removal processes? - How much complexity of aerosol models is necessary? - more
Methods: Document model parameterisations Assemble observed vertical profiles to evaluate models PBL vs. Troposphere, look at mesoscale models Exchange modules (use in the same GCM, link to GMI)
Short-term actions/experiments: Compare AeroCom data to observations Redo simulation for 2003 with specific diagnostics Passive tracer experiment (HTAP CO-experiments)
Data to look: vertical distribution ground-based networks: lidar backscatter (corrected), extinction ARM MPLNET EARLINET satellites: GLASS, MISR?, CALIPSO aircraft campaigns
horizontal distribution station data (surf conc) networks satellite data (e.g. on dust episodes to pin down horizontal transport)
processes wet deposition of SO4? ??
Contact persons/experts provide vertical profile LIDAR data: Rich Ferrare CALIPSO: Dave Winker MISR: Ralph Kahn Access to AeroCom data base: Christiane Textor Dust questions: Paul Ginoux
Specific tasks Validate model results with observed vertical LIDAR profiles: Rich and Christiane
