Usage-based Data Discovery - Episode 2

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Participants

  • Chris Lynnes
  • Joe Lee
  • Irina Gerasimov
  • Adrienne Canino
  • Megan Carter
  • Ed Armstrong
  • Mark Parsons
  • Bob Downs
  • Beth Huffer
  • Jonathan Blythe
  • Doug Newman
  • Steve Olding

Current Actions

  • Done: Lynnes - write up some text for Megan's newsletter
  • Done: Lynnes set up regular meeting with ESIP G2M, some time other than 4th Thursday
  • TBD - spin off a subgroup to work on use cases
  • Done: Lynnes/Newman - generate a sample export of EOSDIS knowledge graph
  • Done: Blythe - provide research_prov_model info on use of W3C Prov model

Agenda

  • Use cases for connecting Data with Usage
    • Best Practice Use Case: Which rainfall dataset is most often used for flood prediction?
    • Impact Use Case: How many climate studies use TRMM 3B42 rainfall?
    • Congruency Use Case: Do field data, airborne lidar, and satellite data match (MAAP)? Do data from sensors on the same satellite match (TerraFusion)?
  • Sample graphs
  • Any other business?
  • Agenda for next telecon…

Notes

  • Use Cases: Participating: Bob, Jonathon, Beth, Ed

Best Practice Use Case

  • Ed: interested in interdisciplinary, datasets used together WITHIN a given application
  • Mark: simple, single dataset use case + complex interdisciplinary use cases
  • Beth: dataset interconnections circles back to data transformations
  • Irina: validation requires MANY different datasets being used together, shows up in separate of research papers that focus on the application vs. those that focus on validation
  • J.B.: discovery / search process: present datasets relevant to their problem, e.g., homeowner types in more colloquial term, interpret what the user's real concern is
  • Adrienne (Axiom Data Science): how do we interact with users where they know what they are getting back; users expect fancy searches, but they need to be transparent (document how they got there) - show the graph!
  • B. Downs: combine with location of interest
  • JB: maybe too big a tech lift at this point?
  • Mark: location is relevant, sure, but how does it
  • Chris: dataset used Gulf of Maine, might be useful in Puget Sound
  • Mark: identify desired outcome

IMPACT Use Case

  • In addition to how many, what type of use cases
  • Beth: Take me to the articles about the data
  • Irina: Data providers want to know about applications of their data; ask them if they know how their data are being used
  • Bob: What other data were used in conjunction with the datasets in a given climate study
  • JB: datasets commonly used together (Mark: closer to Beth's use case variant)
  • JB: IMPACT might be a roll up of lots of datasets
  • Mark: may want to contrast similar instrument, different algorithms, (Chris: or different platforms)
  • Ed: roll up by Societal Benefit Area

Next Agenda

  • Irina, Beth more graphs, how to make them
  • Adrienne: User story, aiming to create at the end
  • Ed: Using graphs for discovery, esp. related datasets, practical examples
  • Mark: Take one of these use cases, work a user story end to end to see what the graph looks like, including the tools
  • Bob: examples of graphs, something about the process we are going through, getting from here to there
  • Megan: Session proposal, ESIP Collaboration Slide

New Actions