Difference between revisions of "Telecon materials"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 27: Line 27:
 
**Start with [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/References_to_literature,_sent_by_01/10/13_meeting_session_participants  References circulated at winter meeting session].   
 
**Start with [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/References_to_literature,_sent_by_01/10/13_meeting_session_participants  References circulated at winter meeting session].   
 
*Get readers/reviewers to read and report back about some portion by summer meeting.
 
*Get readers/reviewers to read and report back about some portion by summer meeting.
 +
 +
==Working Docs, Products==
 +
*Reading list
 +
*Literature Review, for release
 +
*"Options", for release
 +
**Id benefits, goals, costs, risks
 +
*Options Brainstorming, working doc
  
 
==Resources==
 
==Resources==

Revision as of 10:20, January 29, 2013

Plans for January 31, 2013 telecon

Respectfully proposed by Anne. Please chime in.

Potential outcomes of survey

  • Cross agency coordination
  • Id high priority needs
  • Make recommendations for moving forward
  • Metrics
  • Funding priorities
  • Resolving conflicting agency requirements
  • Address cultural barriers

Cluster goals for upcoming year

  • 6 month, summer ESIP meeting, July 9 - 12?
    • Literature review substantially underway
    • List of options and a discussions underway
  • 12 month, winter ESIP meeting, Jan 2014
    • Literature review completed, report written
    • "Options Report" available 1 month prior to winter meeting and distributed to panel members
    • Panel discussion at winter meeting w/ agency reps re: options, etc.

Options

  • scope? earth science or beyond?

IMO we must at least consider scoping beyond earth sciences, even if we ultimately decide it's not feasible. I would be interested in seeking out "widely cross discipline" user stories. Real stories would be most compelling. How might someone from NIH use earth science data? Or a social scientist? First responders? etc. But, we also must consider resource limitations, costs and risks, as best we can estimate them.

Literature Review

Relevant work has already been done and reports have been written. We should be aware of those efforts and leverage them where possible and appropriate.

Working Docs, Products

  • Reading list
  • Literature Review, for release
  • "Options", for release
    • Id benefits, goals, costs, risks
  • Options Brainstorming, working doc

Resources

  • Are there any??? Esp for literature review help?
  • Sarah may have time

Anything Else?