Difference between revisions of "Telecon 09.26.13 materials"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Anne Wilson (talk | contribs) |
Anne Wilson (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
== Becoming a working group == | == Becoming a working group == | ||
*Curt supports the effort, will speak with Carol | *Curt supports the effort, will speak with Carol | ||
| + | |||
| + | = Resulting telecon notes, action items = | ||
| + | |||
| + | == EOS piece == | ||
| + | *Anne W to ask for feedback from Anne J on outline before weekend to identify any needed course corrections DONE | ||
| + | *Anne (W) to ping an EOS editor directly | ||
| + | **Peter F has agreed to provide introduction | ||
| + | *If we don't get published before AGU it's not the end of the world as there are other avenues to publicize the effort, though there's still some hope | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Proposed: a forum for the community to weigh in before the workshop to help scope == | ||
| + | *Attendees were in support of the idea | ||
| + | *We need a list of questions to ask the community. Anne to make a wiki spot for this. DONE: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Questions_to_ask_the_community_regarding_scope,_etc._before_the_January_workshop | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Becoming a working group == | ||
| + | *The Executive Committee meeting is the 2nd Thursday of the month | ||
| + | *We need a name for the working group before then 2nd Thursday of October. As we are not yet fully sure that a Decadal Survey is the best NRC vehicle, our name should be more general | ||
| + | *Anne to make a wiki for the name discussion. DONE: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Suggestions_for_naming_our_working_group | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Workshop funding == | ||
| + | *NSF somewhat turned us down. We'll take NSF and NASA off the table and continue moving forward anyway | ||
| + | |||
| + | == The workshop == | ||
| + | *Next step: identify stakeholder roles we want to represented at the workshop. Anne to make wiki spot for this and populate w/ suggestions from prior meetings. DONE: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Stakeholder_roles_that_should_be_represented_at_the_workshop | ||
| + | *Need to hear from Paul re: mechanisms, sensitivies, what the Academy needs | ||
| + | *Engage with Bill Michener now, Carol to reach out. DONE - we're are in the process of setting up a telecon w/ Bill | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Next telecon == | ||
| + | *Anne on travel next week (unless the government closes) and on leave the week of 10/7 - 10/11 | ||
| + | *We'll schedule a telecon for Thursday, 10/17. If we don't need it we won't use it. | ||
| + | *Regularly scheduled telecon is Thursday, 10/24. If we don't need it we won't use it. | ||
Revision as of 16:01, September 27, 2013
DDS 9.26.13 Updates
EOS piece
- Link to latest draft, draft 4: http://tinyurl.com/of2o7qm
- Anne Johnson, our RENCI in-house writer
- Anne, Carol, Chris, Bob to finish outline, deliver to Anne Johnson (RENCI writer)
- planning for a) being able to publish before AGU, b) having to publish after AGU
Regarding publication in EOS
- Important to engage w/ EOS now to ensure interest and focus
- Updates on approaching EOS editors/reps regarding publication
- Anne to ping Karen
Community input now to help scope workshop?
- A web page?
Carol spoke to the BRDI Board meeting
- fairly positive reaction, insights into Academy mechanisms
- D survey process might not be appropriate vehicle
Workshop funding
- $10K from Moore
- NSF Geo won't fund alone, but might pair with another division, maybe ACI
Workshop
Becoming a working group
- Curt supports the effort, will speak with Carol
Resulting telecon notes, action items
EOS piece
- Anne W to ask for feedback from Anne J on outline before weekend to identify any needed course corrections DONE
- Anne (W) to ping an EOS editor directly
- Peter F has agreed to provide introduction
- If we don't get published before AGU it's not the end of the world as there are other avenues to publicize the effort, though there's still some hope
Proposed: a forum for the community to weigh in before the workshop to help scope
- Attendees were in support of the idea
- We need a list of questions to ask the community. Anne to make a wiki spot for this. DONE: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Questions_to_ask_the_community_regarding_scope,_etc._before_the_January_workshop
Becoming a working group
- The Executive Committee meeting is the 2nd Thursday of the month
- We need a name for the working group before then 2nd Thursday of October. As we are not yet fully sure that a Decadal Survey is the best NRC vehicle, our name should be more general
- Anne to make a wiki for the name discussion. DONE: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Suggestions_for_naming_our_working_group
Workshop funding
- NSF somewhat turned us down. We'll take NSF and NASA off the table and continue moving forward anyway
The workshop
- Next step: identify stakeholder roles we want to represented at the workshop. Anne to make wiki spot for this and populate w/ suggestions from prior meetings. DONE: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Stakeholder_roles_that_should_be_represented_at_the_workshop
- Need to hear from Paul re: mechanisms, sensitivies, what the Academy needs
- Engage with Bill Michener now, Carol to reach out. DONE - we're are in the process of setting up a telecon w/ Bill
Next telecon
- Anne on travel next week (unless the government closes) and on leave the week of 10/7 - 10/11
- We'll schedule a telecon for Thursday, 10/17. If we don't need it we won't use it.
- Regularly scheduled telecon is Thursday, 10/24. If we don't need it we won't use it.
