Return to Archive
- John Porter
- Colin Smith
- Stevan Earl
- Analyzing keyword usage in the IMCR Extracting metadata from Ontosoft, parsing, and analytical approaches.
- Revisiting controlled vocabularies Review IMCR terms, identify and integrate science domain into IMCR best practices.
- ESIP summer meeting plans Review summer meeting presentation and participant activities.
Analyzing keyword usage in the IMCR
Some cursory ideas for analyzing the IMCR contents, primarily for purposes of the summer ESIP meeting in a few weeks.
- Perhaps a cluster analysis of keywords
- Word cloud of term use
- Histogram of term use
Revisiting controlled vocabularies
- If broadly applicable, then better to include all domains rather than none.
- Consider the LTER Controlled vocabulary "disciplines" category of terms
- project management - Too broad. Remove
- process management (e.g. Kelper) - Rename as "workflow management"
- egress - Rename as "export", perhaps delete
- ingress - Rename as "import"
- streaming data - to data streaming
- storage > data base design to planning
- cleaning falls under assurance or control
- spatial data editing/spatial transformation - remove "spatial"
- mind mapping to planning
- metadata rendering to preservation or to transformation
- semantic* sub-terms under semantic operations or annotation
- notification is esoteric (communication)
- retrieval and mining under collection
- crawling - might be too specific
- aggregation - add term
- merging - added term
- interoperatbility - move to preservation
- conversion and reformatting are very simmilar - reformatting under conversion
ESIP summer meeting plans
We never got around to discussing this.
Revise the IMCR CV considering the notes above and feedback from the RFC. (Colin)