Talk:Indirect forcing

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Agenda -- johannes.quaas@zmaw.de (Quaas) 11:59, 30 October 2007 (EDT)

Dedicated Simulation?

Would we want a dedicated simulation for this? If so, the following could be recommended:

2x15 months starting in October 2005 (1x present-day, 1x pre-industrial aerosol emissions); submit output for Jan - Dec 2006

The pre-industrial run would be needed for the forcing estimates. If no nudging option exists, 5-year runs would be needed

If we don't use the Calipso/Cloudsat simulator, any year different from 2006 could be used equally well.

If several groups decide this can be done at a reasonable cost in both man-power and computing time, the advantage of carrying out separate simulations would be to potentially get some initial results quickly.

Wait for CICCS simulator?

The CFMIP ISCCP/Calipso/Cloudsat simulator is scheduled to become available as a beta-release in spring 2008. Should we opt to become test users and implement the beta-version prior to running any experiment?

Re: Wait for CICCS simulator? -- johannes.quaas@zmaw.de (Quaas) 12:48, 30 October 2007 (EDT)

Yves asked about the complexity of the simulator. As perhaps some clue on this, it took me a couple of days to implement and test the ISCCP simulator in ECHAM5, and the interface shouldn't be too different. The ISCCP simulator uses less than 2% of the model's CPU time. I think, however, that the risk is that the CICCS simulator won't be really mature in the beta release.