Difference between revisions of "Talk:Discussion on Natural Organics over North America"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 1: Line 1:
== GAnderson: From isoprene to aerosol  -- [[User:Erinmr|Erinmr]] 15:52, 12 August 2009 (EDT) ==
+
== From isoprene to aerosol  -- [[User:GAnderson|GAnderson]] 11 August 2009 ==
  
 
EPA/RPO Monitoring/Data Analysis: this is from an [http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/46200/title/A_source_of_haze article] in August 7  Science
 
EPA/RPO Monitoring/Data Analysis: this is from an [http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/46200/title/A_source_of_haze article] in August 7  Science
  
===Re: GAnderson: From isoprene to aerosol  -- GAllen===
+
===Re: GAnderson: From isoprene to aerosol  -- [[User:GAllen|GAllen]] 11 August 2009 ===
 
If anyone wants the original Science Mag research article, let me know.
 
If anyone wants the original Science Mag research article, let me know.
  
====Re: Re: GAnderson: From isoprene to aerosol  -- Rhusar====
+
====Re: Re: From isoprene to aerosol  -- [[User:Rhusar|Rhusar]] 11 August 2009====
 
.. and the pattern of isoprene emissions inferred from satellite observations of formaldehyde is [http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/atmosphere/publications/2007JD008950.pdf here].
 
.. and the pattern of isoprene emissions inferred from satellite observations of formaldehyde is [http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/atmosphere/publications/2007JD008950.pdf here].
  
=====Re: Re: Re: GAnderson: From isoprene to aerosol  -- RPoirot=====
+
=====Re: Re: Re: From isoprene to aerosol  -- [[User:RPoirot|RPoirot]] 12 August 2009=====
 
…and which looks sort of like the pattern of upwind average (Donna Kenski method) aerosol OC from multiple IMPROVE and STN sites that you calculated and included as an illustration of an earlier version of the CATT users manual.  When the data were constrained to only the highest percentile concentrations, the forest fire locations stood out, but looking at lower percentiles or average values, the southeast region (of apparently highest biogenic emissions) stands out.  Could this be isoprene-related aerosol?
 
…and which looks sort of like the pattern of upwind average (Donna Kenski method) aerosol OC from multiple IMPROVE and STN sites that you calculated and included as an illustration of an earlier version of the CATT users manual.  When the data were constrained to only the highest percentile concentrations, the forest fire locations stood out, but looking at lower percentiles or average values, the southeast region (of apparently highest biogenic emissions) stands out.  Could this be isoprene-related aerosol?

Revision as of 14:01, August 12, 2009

From isoprene to aerosol -- GAnderson 11 August 2009

EPA/RPO Monitoring/Data Analysis: this is from an article in August 7 Science

Re: GAnderson: From isoprene to aerosol -- GAllen 11 August 2009

If anyone wants the original Science Mag research article, let me know.

Re: Re: From isoprene to aerosol -- Rhusar 11 August 2009

.. and the pattern of isoprene emissions inferred from satellite observations of formaldehyde is here.

Re: Re: Re: From isoprene to aerosol -- RPoirot 12 August 2009

…and which looks sort of like the pattern of upwind average (Donna Kenski method) aerosol OC from multiple IMPROVE and STN sites that you calculated and included as an illustration of an earlier version of the CATT users manual. When the data were constrained to only the highest percentile concentrations, the forest fire locations stood out, but looking at lower percentiles or average values, the southeast region (of apparently highest biogenic emissions) stands out. Could this be isoprene-related aerosol?