Difference between revisions of "Sustainable Data Management/20201009 telcon notes"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 43: Line 43:
 
Look for a paper in DSJ
 
Look for a paper in DSJ
  
Definition of indigenous data: can be very broad.  
+
Definition of indigenous data: can be very broad. Some aspects must be started much earlier in the process than the repo (which may be a steward of products, and not involved in their generation or use.)
  
 
AZ: there is an understanding for human subjects data that tribal permission has been obtained, ownership acknowledged.
 
AZ: there is an understanding for human subjects data that tribal permission has been obtained, ownership acknowledged.
 +
 +
Ruth had some experience with these aspects in Alaska.
 +
 +
Bob: some ethics policies also covered in current frameworks, e.g., human subjects, locale. Citizen science: are there layers of consent here?
 +
 +
Stephanie: deals with lots of consent forms (e.g., public health research) - many are individual consent. there may be a need for collective consent. With citizen science, consent is generally community driven, not top down (citizen-scientists generally not considered human subjects, even if indigenous). Although the difference is blurred (ie, what is/is not human subjects research).
 +
 +
Philip Tarrant: when principles developed, were there many discussions about what is indigenous knowledge? some 'western' knowledge has roots in indigenous (e.g., fairy tales). Definition of "indigenous" is also problematic.
 +
 +
Stephanie: generally tabled that disc. there is always the issue of 'who decides'. depending on group, it may be reduced to only native american, but also includes polynesian, alaskan, etc.some of the issues might be addressable by provenance.
 +
 +
Shelley: data like counts of organisms on indigenous land: Ruth's example - for one kind of data, they only wanted governance over data related to hunting. did not request control of all data. for a dataset, this means governance rules might be sub-dataset, very granular.
 +
  
 
==Action Items==
 
==Action Items==
  
 
*
 
*

Revision as of 14:42, October 9, 2020

To connect

  • Dial in using your phone: :United States: +1 (571) 317-3122
    • Access Code: 618-011-013

Agenda

  1. Introduce guest (Shelley): Stephanie Carrol (stephaniecarroll@arizona.edu)
  2. Review work from Sept
  3. FAIR-CARE-TRUST continued.
    1. CARE principles: https://www.gida-global.org/care
    2. FAIR:
    3. TRUST:

Attending

  • Margaret O'Brien (scribe)
  • Megan Carter
  • Corinna Gries
  • Erin Antognoli
  • Heather ____
  • Philip Tarrant
  • Rebecca Koskela
  • Bob Downs
  • Shelley Stall
  • Stephanie Carrol


Regrets

  • Ruth Duerr

Notes

  • Session was recorded, contact Stephanie.
  • Intro from Stephanie
    • Existing policy frameworks (FAIR) were more focused on measurements, and did not address ethics or high level concerns
    • TRUST did not exist at that time
    • Result: CARE Principles: https://www.gida-global.org/care

Look for a paper in DSJ

Definition of indigenous data: can be very broad. Some aspects must be started much earlier in the process than the repo (which may be a steward of products, and not involved in their generation or use.)

AZ: there is an understanding for human subjects data that tribal permission has been obtained, ownership acknowledged.

Ruth had some experience with these aspects in Alaska.

Bob: some ethics policies also covered in current frameworks, e.g., human subjects, locale. Citizen science: are there layers of consent here?

Stephanie: deals with lots of consent forms (e.g., public health research) - many are individual consent. there may be a need for collective consent. With citizen science, consent is generally community driven, not top down (citizen-scientists generally not considered human subjects, even if indigenous). Although the difference is blurred (ie, what is/is not human subjects research).

Philip Tarrant: when principles developed, were there many discussions about what is indigenous knowledge? some 'western' knowledge has roots in indigenous (e.g., fairy tales). Definition of "indigenous" is also problematic.

Stephanie: generally tabled that disc. there is always the issue of 'who decides'. depending on group, it may be reduced to only native american, but also includes polynesian, alaskan, etc.some of the issues might be addressable by provenance.

Shelley: data like counts of organisms on indigenous land: Ruth's example - for one kind of data, they only wanted governance over data related to hunting. did not request control of all data. for a dataset, this means governance rules might be sub-dataset, very granular.


Action Items