Difference between revisions of "Sustainable Data Management/20200710 telcon notes"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 79: Line 79:
 
* add new folks to list serve - mob
 
* add new folks to list serve - mob
 
* get TRUST mini symp link - mob
 
* get TRUST mini symp link - mob
* start a spreadsheet to brainstorm on a matrix
+
* start a spreadsheet to brainstorm on a matrix - Ruth
*
+
* look at the Sustainable DM google drive?
 +
* https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1JtilFsKtmB4k3_k-dbVS-EsbM8HFQur1

Revision as of 15:07, July 10, 2020

To connect

  • Dial in using your phone: :United States: +1 (571) 317-3122
    • Access Code: 618-011-013

Agenda

  1. summary/discussion of the TRUST mini-symposium.
  2. Hoping some of you have read the TRUST paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-0486-7
  3. Reminder: put this on your sched:
    1. Aligning data publishing workflows among repositories, publishers, funders, and researches
      1. https://2020esipsummermeeting.sched.com/event/cIwG


Attending

  • Margaret O'Brien (scribe)
  • Shelley Stall
  • Megan Carter
  • Sophie Hou
  • Helen Glaves
  • Philip Tarrant
  • Ruth Duerr
  • Erin Antognoii

Regrets

  • Corinna
  • Rebecca


Notes

TRUST mini-symp concentric circles. diagram. - Recording here: _____

- repositories focus on implementation, an inner Circle, within Aspirations (TRUST, FAIR, CARE) and certification (CTS, WDS, ISO) - within that, the HOW (rather than the WHAT)

https://gida-global.org/care


1:32 PMShelley Stall to Everyone The link to the recording of the TRUST mini symposium: https://www.rdc-drc.ca/activities/webinars/archived-webinars/

1:34 PMShelley Stall to Everyone CARE princples: https://www.gida-global.org/care

1:42 PMShelley Stall to Everyone https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100058 Recommendations for Services in a FAIR Data Ecosystem


Matrix: FAIR, CARE, TRUST x repo how-items

Audience for eventual doc:

  • groups aspiring to be repository (or use an existing reps instead of web page-posting) - even individual researchers do this.
  • existing repos aspiring to certification

Aspiration (in the TRUST outer circle) are open to interpretation. Our guidelines describe implementation.

Root cause of the web-page-problem: researchers cannot find repositories that meet their needs

in order to fulfills what your communities ask for (fair, trust, core) here is what repo comm has determined are the base capability to take these, and find repos that meet them.

What about the rest of the data life cycle?

Define "repository": ?

Goals: we want to promote funding to address repos angst (who cannot yet meet these guidelines) prioritize some parts (eg, the T of trust, then items within that)


research community become discerning consumers.

Action Items