Difference between revisions of "Sustainable Data Management/20170210 telcon notes"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
 
Line 45: Line 45:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Share workflow being used by Keith to text mine citations
 
| Share workflow being used by Keith to text mine citations
  || Keith || -
+
  || Keith M || -
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Prepare white paper demonstrating limitations of existing metrics and making recommendations to funders and repositories
 
| Prepare white paper demonstrating limitations of existing metrics and making recommendations to funders and repositories
Line 51: Line 51:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Quantify effort required for metrics collection
 
| Quantify effort required for metrics collection
  || Example || Example
+
  || - || -
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Draft report for EAGER grant, input from everyone.
 
| Draft report for EAGER grant, input from everyone.
Line 57: Line 57:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Conduct a refinement of Jisc methods for comment; draft a methodology for review
 
| Conduct a refinement of Jisc methods for comment; draft a methodology for review
  || Nancy H, Philip T || Example
+
  || Nancy H, Philip T || -
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Establish relative value with respect to ROI for  each metric (e.g., draft survey is available here http://bit.ly/2jammBj)
 
| Establish relative value with respect to ROI for  each metric (e.g., draft survey is available here http://bit.ly/2jammBj)
Line 69: Line 69:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Establish goals for an RCN & if one is desired or useful
 
| Establish goals for an RCN & if one is desired or useful
  || Example || Example
+
  || Example || -
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Get Shelley’s metrics template (upload to ROI-Tempe dir)
 
| Get Shelley’s metrics template (upload to ROI-Tempe dir)
  || Shelley || Example
+
  || Shelley || -
|-
+
 
| Example || Example || Example
 
|-
 
| Example || Example || Example
 
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 17:58, February 10, 2017

To connect

  • Dial in using your phone: :United States: +1 (571) 317-3122
    • Access Code: 618-011-013

Agenda

  1. Post Tempe update
    1. Survey
    2. metrics


Attending

Present: Anne Wilson, John Porter, Margaret O'Brien, Nancy Hobelheinrich, Cyndy Parr, Philip Tarrant, Rebecca Koskela, Robert Downs, Ruth Duerr, Shelley Stall

Regrets:

Notes

  1. follow up from Tempe
    1. Action Items reproduced here:
Action Owned by Due date
Contact Beagrie and assess willingness to interact or collaborate Philip T done
E.g., DataONE webinar (second tuesdays) Philip T tbd
Explore opportunities to meet at RDA (4/2017 or 9/2017) Anne -
Share workflow being used by Keith to text mine citations Keith M -
Prepare white paper demonstrating limitations of existing metrics and making recommendations to funders and repositories All (sdm calls) -
Quantify effort required for metrics collection - -
Draft report for EAGER grant, input from everyone. PIs Example
Conduct a refinement of Jisc methods for comment; draft a methodology for review Nancy H, Philip T -
Establish relative value with respect to ROI for each metric (e.g., draft survey is available here http://bit.ly/2jammBj) Cyndy done
FIll out relative value survey (value to you of this metric for repos in general) All 2017-02-22
Add notes for your repository, your interpretation when you filled out the A-D spreadsheet (specific to your repos) All 2017-03-10
Establish goals for an RCN & if one is desired or useful Example -
Get Shelley’s metrics template (upload to ROI-Tempe dir) Shelley -