Difference between revisions of "P&S Data Quality"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
m
m
Line 2: Line 2:
 
----
 
----
 
==Discussion from March 28, 2006==
 
==Discussion from March 28, 2006==
* What common data quality standards can the Federation offer within the Earth Information Exchange?
+
===What dimensions of quality should be considered?===
::
+
:Quality control
 
+
::Error bar
* What dimensions of quality should be considered?
+
::Contamination (weather, clouds)
::Measurement contamination (weather, clouds)
 
 
::Instrument error
 
::Instrument error
 
::Cross instrument consistency
 
::Cross instrument consistency
 
::Subjective scaling (e.g. quality judgement with range 0-5)
 
::Subjective scaling (e.g. quality judgement with range 0-5)
 +
:Quality assurance (someone tags it as valid)
  
 
* How can we enforce these standards within the Earth Information Exchange?   
 
* How can we enforce these standards within the Earth Information Exchange?   
 +
* What common data quality standards can the Federation offer within the Earth Information Exchange?
 
* What 3rd party ratings can we support?   
 
* What 3rd party ratings can we support?   
 
* Are there similar ratings for "data services"?
 
* Are there similar ratings for "data services"?

Revision as of 15:51, March 28, 2006

Back to: Products and Services


Discussion from March 28, 2006

What dimensions of quality should be considered?

Quality control
Error bar
Contamination (weather, clouds)
Instrument error
Cross instrument consistency
Subjective scaling (e.g. quality judgement with range 0-5)
Quality assurance (someone tags it as valid)
  • How can we enforce these standards within the Earth Information Exchange?
  • What common data quality standards can the Federation offer within the Earth Information Exchange?
  • What 3rd party ratings can we support?
  • Are there similar ratings for "data services"?