Difference between revisions of "Next Steps"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(New page: Mapping Next Steps An assessment of what works and does not…this is a challenge… Costs of working in a community, e.g., meta data not in job description (for modelers and monitoring)...)
 
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Mapping Next Steps
+
{{AQDS_Backlinks}}<br>
 +
'''THANK YOU!'''
 +
 
 +
==Mapping Next Steps==
 
 
An assessment of what works and does not…this is a challenge…
 
Costs of working in a community, e.g., meta data not in job description (for modelers and monitoring)
 
  
 
Help…suggestions…
 
Help…suggestions…
  
1. Meeting report out by 3/7/08
+
# Meeting report out by 3/7/08
2. Establish ad-hoc advisory committee sampled from this group (6-15), [with reporting to larger community]
+
# Establish ad-hoc advisory committee sampled from this group (6-15), [with reporting to         larger community]
3. EPA AMI/GEOSS Keating short term systems RFA
+
# EPA AMI/GEOSS Keating short term systems RFA
4. Scoping out data vision and plan: preferred future
+
# Scoping out data vision and plan: preferred future
a. Includes user communities and system objectives
+
## Includes user communities and system objectives
b. Includes rules in terms of data standards and interface protocols
+
## Includes rules in terms of data standards and interface protocols
c. Includes explicit chaining connections
+
## Includes explicit chaining connections
  
Multiple levels involved
+
== Multiple levels involved==
  
Larger community: wiki advisory committee; community wide report include:
+
===Larger community: wiki advisory committee; community wide report include:===
  
inventory of systems
+
* inventory of systems
opportunities for leveraging
+
* opportunities for leveraging
initial perspectives on inefficiencies
+
* initial perspectives on inefficiencies
recommendations on formatting and access conventions
+
* recommendations on formatting and access conventions
• cost of community systems (monitoring meta data)
+
* costs of participating in community systems (e.g., monitoring meta data)
assessment (relative strengths and weaknesses of systems)
+
* assessment (relative strengths and weaknesses of systems)
 
   
 
   
Federal agency
+
===Federal agency===
reviewing partnerships, especially EPA, NASA, NOAA ad hoc to date, data are a natural NASA has been major catalyst (Data Fed, ESIP)..fmgaq
+
* reviewing partnerships, especially EPA, NASA, NOAA ad hoc to date, data are a natural NASA has been major catalyst (Data Fed, ESIP)..FMGAQ
role of U.S GEO…..who is guiding who  here
+
* role of U.S GEO…..who is guiding who  here
 
   
 
   
  
EPA (OAR, OEI, ORD, ORD/NOAA)
+
====EPA (OAR, OEI, ORD, ORD/NOAA)====
 +
* EPA integration systems are immature
 +
* Management and coordination issues galore
 +
* Assessment of systems???....systems run rampant…redundancies and inadequacies
 +
* Chet/Rich…deliver recommendations/briefing to OAR/OEI and ORD management…illustrate redundancies, lack of coordination, blunt assessment
 +
** At a minimum remove barriers and provide incentives for responsibility in community framework
 +
** Challenging the single client concept
 +
* Closer to home….cost of being in a community (e.g., monitoring group improving meta data, especially site representativeness for model evaluation)
 +
* Ask IG to assess epa air data systems 
 +
* Or ..perform an objective assessment, system costs, user frequency, surveys…
 +
 
 +
[[Media:DatasummitMapping_Next_Steps.doc]]
  
• EPA integration systems are immature
+
[[LinkedTo::Community Air Quality Data System Workspace]]
• Management and coordination issues galore
+
[[LinkedTo::Data Summit Workspace]][[Date::2008-04-14]][[Subpage::Next Steps]][[Creator::Scheffe]]
• Assessment of systems???....systems run rampant…redundancies and inadequacies
 
• Chet/Rich…deliver recommendations/briefing to OAR/OEI and ORD management…illustrate redundancies, lack of coordination, blunt assessment
 
o At a minimum remove barriers and provide incentives for responsibility in community framework
 
o Challenging the single client concept
 
• Closer to home….cost of being in a community (e.g., monitoring group improving meta data, especially site representativeness for model evaluation)
 
• Ask IG to assess epa air data systems 
 
• Or ..perform an objective assessment, system costs, user frequency, surveys…
 

Latest revision as of 17:04, April 12, 2009

Back to <Data Summit Workspace
Back to <Community Air Quality Data System Workspace

THANK YOU!

Mapping Next Steps

Help…suggestions…

  1. Meeting report out by 3/7/08
  2. Establish ad-hoc advisory committee sampled from this group (6-15), [with reporting to larger community]
  3. EPA AMI/GEOSS Keating short term systems RFA
  4. Scoping out data vision and plan: preferred future
    1. Includes user communities and system objectives
    2. Includes rules in terms of data standards and interface protocols
    3. Includes explicit chaining connections

Multiple levels involved

Larger community: wiki advisory committee; community wide report include:

  • inventory of systems
  • opportunities for leveraging
  • initial perspectives on inefficiencies
  • recommendations on formatting and access conventions
  • costs of participating in community systems (e.g., monitoring meta data)
  • assessment (relative strengths and weaknesses of systems)

Federal agency

  • reviewing partnerships, especially EPA, NASA, NOAA ad hoc to date, data are a natural NASA has been major catalyst (Data Fed, ESIP)..FMGAQ
  • role of U.S GEO…..who is guiding who here


EPA (OAR, OEI, ORD, ORD/NOAA)

  • EPA integration systems are immature
  • Management and coordination issues galore
  • Assessment of systems???....systems run rampant…redundancies and inadequacies
  • Chet/Rich…deliver recommendations/briefing to OAR/OEI and ORD management…illustrate redundancies, lack of coordination, blunt assessment
    • At a minimum remove barriers and provide incentives for responsibility in community framework
    • Challenging the single client concept
  • Closer to home….cost of being in a community (e.g., monitoring group improving meta data, especially site representativeness for model evaluation)
  • Ask IG to assess epa air data systems 
  • Or ..perform an objective assessment, system costs, user frequency, surveys…

Media:DatasummitMapping_Next_Steps.doc

Community Air Quality Data System Workspace Data Summit Workspace2008-04-14Next StepsScheffe