Difference between revisions of "Next Steps"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Mapping Next Steps''' | '''Mapping Next Steps''' | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Help…suggestions… | Help…suggestions… | ||
1. Meeting report out by 3/7/08 | 1. Meeting report out by 3/7/08 | ||
| − | 2. Establish ad-hoc advisory committee sampled from this group (6-15), [with reporting to larger community] | + | 2. Establish ad-hoc advisory committee sampled from this group (6-15), [with reporting to larger community] |
3. EPA AMI/GEOSS Keating short term systems RFA | 3. EPA AMI/GEOSS Keating short term systems RFA | ||
4. Scoping out data vision and plan: preferred future | 4. Scoping out data vision and plan: preferred future | ||
| Line 24: | Line 22: | ||
• initial perspectives on inefficiencies | • initial perspectives on inefficiencies | ||
• recommendations on formatting and access conventions | • recommendations on formatting and access conventions | ||
| − | • | + | • costs of participating in community systems (e.g., monitoring meta data) |
• assessment (relative strengths and weaknesses of systems) | • assessment (relative strengths and weaknesses of systems) | ||
Federal agency | Federal agency | ||
| − | • reviewing partnerships, especially EPA, NASA, NOAA ad hoc to date, data are a natural NASA has been major catalyst (Data Fed, ESIP).. | + | • reviewing partnerships, especially EPA, NASA, NOAA ad hoc to date, data are a natural NASA has been major catalyst (Data Fed, ESIP)..FMGAQ |
• role of U.S GEO…..who is guiding who here | • role of U.S GEO…..who is guiding who here | ||
Revision as of 12:21, February 13, 2008
THANK YOU!
Mapping Next Steps
Help…suggestions…
1. Meeting report out by 3/7/08 2. Establish ad-hoc advisory committee sampled from this group (6-15), [with reporting to larger community] 3. EPA AMI/GEOSS Keating short term systems RFA 4. Scoping out data vision and plan: preferred future a. Includes user communities and system objectives b. Includes rules in terms of data standards and interface protocols c. Includes explicit chaining connections
Multiple levels involved
Larger community: wiki advisory committee; community wide report include:
• inventory of systems • opportunities for leveraging • initial perspectives on inefficiencies • recommendations on formatting and access conventions • costs of participating in community systems (e.g., monitoring meta data) • assessment (relative strengths and weaknesses of systems)
Federal agency • reviewing partnerships, especially EPA, NASA, NOAA ad hoc to date, data are a natural NASA has been major catalyst (Data Fed, ESIP)..FMGAQ • role of U.S GEO…..who is guiding who here
EPA (OAR, OEI, ORD, ORD/NOAA)
• EPA integration systems are immature • Management and coordination issues galore • Assessment of systems???....systems run rampant…redundancies and inadequacies • Chet/Rich…deliver recommendations/briefing to OAR/OEI and ORD management…illustrate redundancies, lack of coordination, blunt assessment o At a minimum remove barriers and provide incentives for responsibility in community framework o Challenging the single client concept • Closer to home….cost of being in a community (e.g., monitoring group improving meta data, especially site representativeness for model evaluation) • Ask IG to assess epa air data systems • Or ..perform an objective assessment, system costs, user frequency, surveys…
