Difference between revisions of "NOAA Sessions on NIDIS, CLASS, the Data Centers, and much much more!"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 64: Line 64:
 
This discussion requires that you suspend your disbelief and imagine for a bit that the title is true. Imagine that there is a metadata standard that can be used successfully for many data types served, preserved, and used by NOAA and our ESIP partners. I will use the current ISO 19115 and 19115-2 standards as a straw-person for that imaginary "universal" metadata standard.
 
This discussion requires that you suspend your disbelief and imagine for a bit that the title is true. Imagine that there is a metadata standard that can be used successfully for many data types served, preserved, and used by NOAA and our ESIP partners. I will use the current ISO 19115 and 19115-2 standards as a straw-person for that imaginary "universal" metadata standard.
  
===ISO Features===
+
This session was interesting and informative. The results are on the [[ISO Metadata Features]] page.
As a starting point we can consider this list of features provided by these ISO Standards. Please use these pages to describe datasets or situations which present these needs. If you are currently addressing these needs with metadata, please describe how.
 
 
 
*[[ISO Identifiers|Do you need to unambiguously identify things using your own namespace?]]
 
*[[ISO Database|Do you want to manage metadata using a relational or XML database?]]
 
*[[ISO REST|Do you want to serve metadata using a REST web service?]]
 
*[[ISO People|Do you need to identify people in different roles?]]
 
*[[ISO Scope|Do you need different documentation for different parts of your data?]]
 
*[[ISO Extents|Do you need different documentation for different temporal and spatial subsets?]]
 
*[[ISO On-Line Resources|Do you need to reference On-Line Resources?]]
 
*[[ISO Aggregation|Do you need to describe many kinds of aggregations?]]
 
*[[ISO Quality Scope|Does data quality vary within the dataset?]]
 
*[[ISO Compliance Reports|Do you need to track compliance with standards?]]
 
*[[ISO Feature Reports|Do you need to use spatial features to describe quality, like grids of quality flags?]]
 
*[[ISO Users|Do you need to keep track of user problems?]]
 
*[[ISO Source Scope|Do you need to describe sources with different spatial and temporal extents?]]
 
*[[ISO Requirements and Objectives|Do you need to describe requirements and objectives?]]
 
*[[ISO Platforms and Instruments|Do you need to describe platforms and instruments?]]
 
*[[ISO Rationale|Do you need to explain why you did things to the data?]]
 
*[[ISO Sharing|Do need to share data with international partners?]]
 
  
 
[[Category: ISO Metadata]]
 
[[Category: ISO Metadata]]

Revision as of 14:55, July 19, 2008

NOAA is hosting a series of breakout sessions at the Summer ESIP Meeting and we hope you will participate. In all of these sessions, we hope to inform you of some things going on within NOAA, and more importantly, be informed BY you. Your input, feedback, and advice is critical to us! Please join in the discussions. Our initial list of topics is provided below, and of course we welcome your ideas as well... this is a wiki after all, so please feel free to add your ideas here as well.


Overall Organizer: Ken Casey (Kenneth.Casey@noaa.gov)


National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS)

  • "how do we organize a larger activity based upon what we learn from smaller activities".
  • Discussion led by Mike Brewer (Michael.J.Brewer@noaa.gov)


The NEW Comprehensive Large Array Data Stewardship System (CLASS) - NOAA Data Center Paradigm

  • "how the Open Archival Information System Reference Model is leading us into the light".
  • Discussion led by Ken Casey (Kenneth.Casey@noaa.gov)

Report:

Over 25 people participated in this breakout discussion, which was lively and vigorous. Our main goal in this breakout session was to begin breaking down the broad misunderstandings regarding the relationship between CLASS and the NOAA Data Centers. Ken Casey led the discussion, which began with an explanation of how the OAIS Reference Model has helped NOAA/NESDIS clarify the different roles and responsibilities. The new paradigm clearly assigns CLASS solely an IT infrastructure role in support of the NOAA Data Centers and their archive missions.

Three key conclusions were drawn:

1. The group did indeed develop a much better understanding of the new Data Center - CLASS relationships. There were many questions along these lines and broad agreement regarding the new roles. There was also consensus that those of us in NOAA do need to take this message out into the communities of interest, and that after doing that for some amount of time that we could eventually stop talking about CLASS as a a separate entity.

2. At future ESIP Federation meetings, there was agreement in the group that ESIP could help NOAA (the Data Centers and CLASS) develop and implement the connections that are needed for the Data Centers to effectively leverage CLASS capabilities to better serve the users.

3. As confusion regarding CLASS roles is eliminated, the ESIP meeting attendees wanted to begin talking more about the Access functions, and to an extent, the Ingest functions.

The following powerpoint presentation (not given, but a couple slides were referenced) and images were used to help clarify aspects of the discussion.

File:OAIS Overview 22Apr2008.ppt

OAIS FunctionalEntities.jpg

OAIS RM Fig6-4 SharedStorage.jpg

The CLASS Application Programming Interface - SNAAP!

  • "could it really be that easy?". (of course not!)
  • Discussion led by Ken Casey (Kenneth.Casey@noaa.gov)

Report:

Eric Kihn, the lead developer for SNAAP, could not be at the meeting but in his absence we attempted to have a meaningful conversation based on the presentation he provided below.

File:SNAAP ESIP08.ppt

About 21 people from across the Federation participated. It was clear almost immediately that the questions being raised were beyond the other NOAA personnel present. It was also clear that there was a lot of technical interest in the approaches being pursued in this prototype to deliver machine-to-machine access to NOAA's archive holdings, both those physically residing in the CLASS IT infrastructure as well as in other NOAA Data Center IT systems.

The group identified the topic of how NOAA should provide API access to its archive data holdings as a key item to take up at the January meeting, with a technical focus on the SNAAP prototype.

The Evolution of Data Management at NOAA

  • "We are data management - how NOAA is living up to this quote form the NOAA Administrator at a previous ESIP meeting".
  • Discussion led by Ken McDonald (Kenneth.Mcdonald@noaa.gov)


Metadata - One size does fit all!!

  • Discussion led Ted Habermann (Ted.Habermann@noaa.gov)

This discussion requires that you suspend your disbelief and imagine for a bit that the title is true. Imagine that there is a metadata standard that can be used successfully for many data types served, preserved, and used by NOAA and our ESIP partners. I will use the current ISO 19115 and 19115-2 standards as a straw-person for that imaginary "universal" metadata standard.

This session was interesting and informative. The results are on the ISO Metadata Features page.