Difference between revisions of "NASA ROSES 08 Checklist"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Need Integrated system solutions diagram to portray/illustrate our | + | Need Integrated system solutions diagram to portray/illustrate our project: http://nasascience.nasa.gov/earth*science/applied*sciences/solicitations/information*to*support*proposals |
| − | + | * [http://nasascience.nasa.gov/earth-science/applied-sciences/solicitations/ISS_chart_download.ppt blank diagram] | |
===Proposal summary:=== | ===Proposal summary:=== | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* Approach to quantify improvements in the system performance (risk/uncertainty) | * Approach to quantify improvements in the system performance (risk/uncertainty) | ||
* approach to quantify socioeconomic value and benefits for resulting improvements | * approach to quantify socioeconomic value and benefits for resulting improvements | ||
| − | * key technical, policy, operation and | + | * key technical, policy, operation and engagement challenges and the approach to address challenges |
| − | * describe tools, system, assessment in detail including | + | * describe tools, system, assessment in detail including decision analysis factors, unique roles for E.S. data and other pertinent info. |
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
===Performance Measures: === | ===Performance Measures: === | ||
* Quantitative/Qualitative measures of outcome, results and value of project | * Quantitative/Qualitative measures of outcome, results and value of project | ||
| + | |||
| + | other performance measures: | ||
| + | * forecast skill scores | ||
| + | * change in planning time | ||
| + | * change in response time (e.g. disaster response time) | ||
| + | * percentage of population served | ||
| + | * level or certainty/uncertainty in the decision support system | ||
| + | * false negatives/false positives | ||
| + | * exposure assessment time and accuracy | ||
| + | * control measure effectiveness | ||
===Anticipated results=== | ===Anticipated results=== | ||
| Line 47: | Line 57: | ||
** Plans for delivery of project results | ** Plans for delivery of project results | ||
** Final report | ** Final report | ||
| + | |||
| + | Project metrics | ||
| + | * Percent of tasks starting/ending as planned | ||
| + | * Number (or percent) of deliverables meeting quality standards | ||
| + | * Integration time of observations/model products into the decision support system | ||
| + | * Delivery time of Earth science products | ||
| + | * Costs for production of value-added products | ||
| + | * Number of iterations to verify data product integration | ||
| + | * Time to correct a problem | ||
| + | * Milestones met ahead of schedule | ||
| + | * Run-time for a decision support system | ||
* Project schedule (1pg) | * Project schedule (1pg) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:48, August 12, 2008
Need Integrated system solutions diagram to portray/illustrate our project: http://nasascience.nasa.gov/earth*science/applied*sciences/solicitations/information*to*support*proposals
Proposal summary:
- Explicitly state which of NASA 8 areas the proposal relates to (if more than 2 identify top 3)
- how does project respond to priority topic (AQ)
Decision Support:
- describe activity
- magangemt, policy, business topic or issue
- identify end users
- quantify pre*project baseline
E.S. Research Results:
- Identify all data products used.
In Tech approach:
- perceived impact of work
- objectives and relevance to NASA past/present/future
- Methodology
- Systematic approach to integrate E.S. data into DSS and to develop and test integrated system
- data sharing plan/provide evidence of past data sharing.
- Approach to quantify improvements in the system performance (risk/uncertainty)
- approach to quantify socioeconomic value and benefits for resulting improvements
- key technical, policy, operation and engagement challenges and the approach to address challenges
- describe tools, system, assessment in detail including decision analysis factors, unique roles for E.S. data and other pertinent info.
Transition Approach:
- Articulate transition plan
( GEOSS AIP, tutorials with EPA)
Performance Measures:
- Quantitative/Qualitative measures of outcome, results and value of project
other performance measures:
- forecast skill scores
- change in planning time
- change in response time (e.g. disaster response time)
- percentage of population served
- level or certainty/uncertainty in the decision support system
- false negatives/false positives
- exposure assessment time and accuracy
- control measure effectiveness
Anticipated results
- State quantitative hypothesis
- estimate expected improvements
Project Management: (2pg)
- plan of work
- Partnership arrangements
- expected contribution, roles,responsibilities of team members
- Milestones
- For Biannual reports
- demo/prototype needed 2x (1 proof of concept, 1 use and performance enhanced of decision*making activity)
- Plans for delivery of project results
- Final report
Project metrics
- Percent of tasks starting/ending as planned
- Number (or percent) of deliverables meeting quality standards
- Integration time of observations/model products into the decision support system
- Delivery time of Earth science products
- Costs for production of value-added products
- Number of iterations to verify data product integration
- Time to correct a problem
- Milestones met ahead of schedule
- Run-time for a decision support system
- Project schedule (1pg)
