Module Review Process

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Revision as of 15:21, March 23, 2012 by Rduerr (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Back to the Data Management Training home page

We've agreed on a three step process:

  1. Subject domain experts will conduct a peer review. Reviewers will review modules for internal logic, accuracy, and completeness with respect to the subject of the module and the concepts within it.
  2. An editorial review of the module in terms of its fit and placement within the course outline as well as how the language, illustrations, and concepts covered harmonize with the other modules
  3. A technical editor will review the modules for grammatical and spelling errors, etc.