Module Review Criteria

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Revision as of 19:20, March 7, 2012 by Nhoebelheinrich (talk | contribs) (Created page with "When your module is reviewed, here are the criteria the reviewers will be using... The module should be well-formed (i.e., follow the guidelines above) The content is ba...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

When your module is reviewed, here are the criteria the reviewers will be using...

   The module should be well-formed (i.e., follow the guidelines above)
   The content is balanced in that it should be concise, yet simultaneously both accurate and complete
   The references should be relevant and any URL's should work
   The content should be geared to a non-expert yet undergraduate or general college level audience
   The content should be simple and understandable by that audience
   Jargon and data management terminology (e.g., data set, granule, etc.) needs to be defined or avoided
   Imagery should be appropriate to the topic and either openly available or appropriately cited