Difference between revisions of "Modification of existing CF standard names"
(New page: '''SUGGESTED CHANGES''' <br /> ==Individual names== (old names in bold) <p><strong>mass_fraction_ammonium_dry_aerosol_in_air</strong><br /> This should be mass_fraction_OF_ammonium_dry_aer...)
|Line 1:||Line 1:|
Revision as of 06:12, October 29, 2008
Return to Start page for Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosol Names PLEASE DO NOT USE THE NAVIGATION BAR ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE!
(old names in bold)
This should be mass_fraction_OF_ammonium_dry_aerosol_in_air
This should be mass_concentration_of_sulfate_DRY_aerosol_in_air
The other optical thickness names are built like this:
For consistency, I would suggest to change the first name to
new: I am not sure
The Guidelines for Construction of CF Standard Names
state for 'atmosphere' under 'Special Phrases':
used instead of in_air for quantities which are large-scale rather than local '
This is not correct for the chemicals and aerosols. Here in_air is
opposed to in_cloud, in_rain, etc, where as in_atmosphere describes
the whole atmosphere. Therefore in_atmosphere cannot be the same as
In addition, 'atmosphere' not consistently placed:
Hence, atmosphere is also used as a prefix. I would suggest to change
this and only use the term in_atmosphere.
position of 'expressed as'
I would suggest to attach the 'expressed_as' to the quality it refers
In some of the accepted standard names this is however not the case, like
for example in
In this case the Medium is squeezed in.
aerosol - ambient or dry
I would suggest to get rid of the term aerosol and replace it by
dry_aerosol or/and ambient_aerosol for the atmosphere to avoid