Difference between revisions of "Metadata Dialects"

Latest revision as of 11:40, July 29, 2015

Metadata content can be approached in a variety of “dialects,” depending on the needs of specific user communities. Though different, these languages also significantly overlap – as the “who, where, when, why, and how” must always be addressed, regardless of the community approach. Thus, in reality, these differences in approach are more akin to dialects of a universal documentation language than multiple, disparate languages. As such, for the purposes of this work, the term “metadata dialect” will refer to standardized metadata documentation approaches, in order to promote emphasis on universal documentation concepts as opposed to implementation of individual standards. The following are some of the most common dialects used throughout the ESIP community.

Note: While they are discussed independently, a dialect can use aspects of other dialects within its own — if the two dialects have the same/similar structure or the same file format.

Let's Start at the Beginning

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==FGDC (Federal Geographic Data Committee)==
+Metadata content can be approached in a variety of “dialects,” depending on the needs of specific user communities.  Though different, these languages also significantly overlap – as the “who, where, when, why, and how” must always be addressed, regardless of the community approach.  Thus, in reality, these differences in approach are more akin to dialects of a universal documentation language than multiple, disparate languages.  As such, for the purposes of this work, the term “metadata dialect” will refer to standardized metadata documentation approaches, in order to promote emphasis on universal documentation concepts as opposed to implementation of individual standards.
+The following are some of the most common dialects used throughout the ESIP community.
-The Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) is an interagency committee that promotes the coordinated development, use, sharing, and dissemination of geospatial data on a national basis. This nationwide data publishing effort is known as the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI). The NSDI is a physical, organizational, and virtual network designed to enable the development and sharing of this nation's digital geographic information resources. FGDC activities are administered through the FGDC Secretariat, hosted by the U.S. Geological Survey.
+''Note:  While they are discussed independently, a dialect can use aspects of other dialects within its own — if the two dialects have the same/similar structure or the same file format.''
-[[http://www.fgdc.gov/ website]]
-[[http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/metadata/base-metadata/v2_0698.pdf Content Standards]]
-==ISO==
+* [[ADIwg (Alaska Data Integration Working Group)]]
-ISO International Standards ensure that products and services are safe, reliable and of good quality. For business, they are strategic tools that reduce costs by minimizing waste and errors and increasing productivity. They help companies to access new markets, level the playing field for developing countries and facilitate free and fair global trade.
+* [[CSDGM  (FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata)]]
-[[http://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm ISO]]
+* [[DCAT (Data Catalog Vocabulary)]]
+* [[Dcite (DataCite 3.1)]]
+* [[DIF (Directory Interchange Format)]]
+* [[Dryad]]
+* [[ECHO (EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEM (EOS) CLEARINGHOUSE)]]
+* [[ECS (EOSDIS Core System)]]
+* [[EML (Ecological Metadata Language)]]
+* [[HCLS (Dataset Descriptions: HCLS Community Profile)]]
+* [[HDF EOS5 (Hierarchical Data Format Earth Observing System 5)]]
+* [[ISO]]
+* [[ISO -1]]
+* [[netCDF (Network Common Data Format) Conventions]]
+* [[SERF (Service Entry Resource Format)]]
+* [[SOS (Sensor Observation Service)]]
+* [[THREDDS (Thematic Realtime Environmental Distributed Data Services)]]
+* [[WSDL (Web Service Description Language)]]
-ISO 19115:2003 defines the schema required for describing geographic information and services. It provides information about the identification, the extent, the quality, the spatial and temporal schema, spatial reference, and distribution of digital geographic data.
-===ISO 19115:2003 is applicable to:===
-*the cataloguing of datasets, clearinghouse activities, and the full description of datasets;
-*geographic datasets, dataset series, and individual geographic features and feature properties.
-===ISO 19115:2003 defines:===
-*mandatory and conditional metadata sections, metadata entities, and metadata elements;
-*the minimum set of metadata required to serve the full range of metadata applications (data discovery, determining data fitness for use, data access, data transfer, and use of digital data);
-*optional metadata elements - to allow for a more extensive standard description of geographic data, if required;
-*a method for extending metadata to fit specialized needs.
-Though ISO 19115:2003 is applicable to digital data, its principles can be extended to many other forms of geographic data such as maps, charts, and textual documents as well as non-geographic data.
+[[Let's Start at the Beginning]]
-ISO 19115-2:2009 extends the existing geographic metadata standard by defining the schema required for describing imagery and gridded data. It provides information about the properties of the measuring equipment used to acquire the data, the geometry of the measuring process employed by the equipment, and the production process used to digitize the raw data. This extension deals with metadata needed to describe the derivation of geographic information from raw data, including the properties of the measuring system, and the numerical methods and computational procedures used in the derivation. The metadata required to address coverage data in general is addressed sufficiently in the general part of ISO 19115.
-[[http://www.isotc211.org/2005/resources/Codelist/gmxCodelists.xml Codelist]]
-==DIF (Directory Interchange Format)==
-[[http://gcmd.nasa.gov/User/difguide/difman.html DIF Writer's Guide]]
-The DIF has enjoyed over 20 years of success. The DIF structure has been flexible enough to evolve with growing metadata requirements, especially for the geospatial disciplines. The DIF does not compete with other metadata standards. It is simply the "container" for the metadata elements that are maintained in the IDN database, where validation for mandatory fields, keywords, personnel, etc. takes place.The DIF is used to create directory entries which describe a group of data. A DIF consists of a collection of fields which detail specific information about the data. Eight fields are required in the DIF; the others expand upon and clarify the information. Some of the fields are text fields, others require the use of controlled keywords (sometimes known as "valids").
-[[http://gcmd.nasa.gov/Aboutus/xml/dif/dif.xsd XML schema]]
-==ECHO==
-==ECS==
-==netCDF==
-==THREDDS==
-==SOS==
-==EML==
-==Dryad==