Main Page/Start here

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
< Main Page
Revision as of 22:11, September 3, 2014 by Merryyuecai (talk | contribs)

This is the test page for the Editor's Roundtable - Best Practices for data Publication

What is the Editor's Roundtable?[edit | edit source]

The Editor's Roundtable is an effort to facilitate and foster communication and knowledge exchange among editors and publishers of Earth Science journals and Earth Science data facilities with the goal to develop, implement, and promote guidelines and best practices for scholarly publishing with particular emphasis on the publication of data in support of open access policies.

The Editors Roundtable is a community-based initiative, conceived by editors, publishers, and operators of data facilities at a series of meetings held in conjunction with major scientific conferences that IEDA facilitated. It is a timely effort that will support responses to recent open-data directives from funders and governments world-wide to make the results of federally funded research more easily and openly accessible and re-usable to further scientific discovery and innovation. The Editors Roundtable builds on a successful initiative started in 2007 by EarthChem, which since 2010 is part of the IEDA data facility, to develop and promote best practices for the reporting of geochemical data in scholarly articles and data systems, and that resulted in a Policy Recommendation ‘Requirements for the Publication of Geochemical Data’ (Goldstein et al. 2014, doi:10.1594/IEDA/100426), which was endorsed by all major scientific journals that publish geochemical data and has guided policies for the disclosure and documentation of geochemical data.

Existing data facilities[edit | edit source]

  1. EarthChem
  3. Pangea
  4. Data cite
  5. Council of Data Facilities - EarthCube
  8. USGS publication warehouse
  9. NASA
  10. NOAA
  1. NERC data centers includes the following:
  1. Centre for Environmental Data Archival
  2. National Geoscience Data Centre
  1. Smithsonian

Text to show

The “best practices” will include standards for:[edit | edit source]

  1. Archiving and curating data sets;
  2. Setting references and identifiers;
  3. Linking datasets to publications;
  4. Integrating with emerging data citation practices and bibliometrics for data;
  5. Complying with interoperability standards.

For Editors[edit | edit source]

  1. Data Accessibility and Format

Access to the complete data, upon which new scientific discovery and knowledge is based, is a fundamental requirement for the reproducibility of scientific results. All NEW geochemical data used in a publication must be made available for future use by (1) submission to an accessible, persistent source such as a public database or data archive (for example, personal web sites are not persistent data archives), if it exists for the specific data type, or by (2) listing the data explicitly in a data table associated with the publication. The data must in any case be available in downloadable format. For chemical abundance data of samples, elemental or oxide abundance data must be given unless a compelling reason can be provided; elemental abundance ratios are acceptable only if the compositional data do not exist. Isotope ratios are, of course, acceptable.

Data should be reported in tabular format. Data must always be available as a downloadable file in a format that can be easily converted into spreadsheet format (for example, .csv, .txt). The file should include units for the listed measured values. This means that if a publication contains a data table in the main text or a pdf or image version of the data table as an electronic supplement, the data in the table(s) must also be available in a downloadable form that can be easily converted to spreadsheet format.

  1. Data Quality Information

For Authors[edit | edit source]

For data facilities[edit | edit source]

  1. GENSEKI data policy
  2. NERC data policy
  3. USGS