Difference between revisions of "June 28, 2011"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Carol Meyer (ESIP) | * Carol Meyer (ESIP) | ||
* Erin Robinson (ESIP) | * Erin Robinson (ESIP) | ||
− | * | + | * Barry White |
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
+ | * Discuss the agenda of the meeting and the break out groups in Santa Fe. | ||
+ | * SPG Session on Quality Tuesday Morning | ||
+ | * ISO Data Quality Discussion | ||
+ | * Actions | ||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
+ | * Discuss the agenda of the meeting and the break out groups in Santa Fe. | ||
+ | ** Barry - JPL policy require that everything has to go through document review, can talk about ISO and ISO quality. Barry is a software engineer (not a scientist per se) that generates data for scientists. | ||
+ | ** Carol - 3 talks in the plenary. Greg Stensas will give overview of multiple quality definitions, Bill Michener - Data 1, LTER used qual measures, Panel discussion quality needs across various communities. | ||
+ | ** Carol contacted some of plenary speakers to engage in IQ session. Glen Rutledge and Nick Mangus - will leave before Thursday and not able to participate | ||
+ | ** Greg - Semantic web/IQ session will be before the semantic web session we need to get a few speakers to fill the 45 minutes, possibly the speakers will be from the session that ends prior to that. | ||
+ | ** Carol - One of the four people from Neon should present. | ||
+ | ** Barry White - We need someone with experience in developing ontologies. | ||
+ | ** Barry - Ted Haberman is doing a workshop on tuesday, Greg is plannng to ask Ted to do something on thursday as well. | ||
+ | ** Greg - Rob, any suggestions who to invite to info session? | ||
+ | ** Rob - Bruce Barkstrom? | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | * SPG Session on Quality Tuesday Morning | ||
+ | ** Greg Stensas listed on SPG agenda and should talk about SPG agenda. | ||
+ | ** Greg S. will also be talking on Wednesday at a plenary session. | ||
+ | ** Chris Lynnes and Barry White are talking about quality at SPG. | ||
+ | ** Greg and Barry will participate in SPG | ||
− | + | * ISO Data Quality Discussion | |
+ | * Barry - Quality is one of the major reasons for metadata. | ||
+ | * Greg - Europeans don't want to use ISO because it is still too fluid and has not been improved yet. | ||
+ | * Barry - Temporal Consistency in data quality - whatever ISO tells us about temporal consistency is not formulated enough, has an opinion gap that needs to be filled. | ||
− | + | * Actions | |
− | + | ** Greg - will try to prepare better list of quality indicators so we could have lively discussions about what community thinks about quality indicators. - For second discussion breakout. | |
− | Greg | + | ** Greg will send a message to Ted Haberman, also contact Gregg Stensas tell him we expect him on thursday and ask to mention during plenary talks. |
− | + | ** Carol - contacted Steve for NASA quality and will post it on wiki once he emails back. ??? | |
− | + | ** Carol emailed NEON and...? | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Carol - contacted Steve and will post it on wiki once he emails back. ??? | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Carol emailed NEON and...? | ||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 08:47, June 29, 2011
Participants
- Gregory Leptoukh (NASA GSFC)
- Oleg Aulov (UMBC)
- Carol Meyer (ESIP)
- Erin Robinson (ESIP)
- Barry White
Agenda
- Discuss the agenda of the meeting and the break out groups in Santa Fe.
- SPG Session on Quality Tuesday Morning
- ISO Data Quality Discussion
- Actions
Notes
- Discuss the agenda of the meeting and the break out groups in Santa Fe.
- Barry - JPL policy require that everything has to go through document review, can talk about ISO and ISO quality. Barry is a software engineer (not a scientist per se) that generates data for scientists.
- Carol - 3 talks in the plenary. Greg Stensas will give overview of multiple quality definitions, Bill Michener - Data 1, LTER used qual measures, Panel discussion quality needs across various communities.
- Carol contacted some of plenary speakers to engage in IQ session. Glen Rutledge and Nick Mangus - will leave before Thursday and not able to participate
- Greg - Semantic web/IQ session will be before the semantic web session we need to get a few speakers to fill the 45 minutes, possibly the speakers will be from the session that ends prior to that.
- Carol - One of the four people from Neon should present.
- Barry White - We need someone with experience in developing ontologies.
- Barry - Ted Haberman is doing a workshop on tuesday, Greg is plannng to ask Ted to do something on thursday as well.
- Greg - Rob, any suggestions who to invite to info session?
- Rob - Bruce Barkstrom?
- SPG Session on Quality Tuesday Morning
- Greg Stensas listed on SPG agenda and should talk about SPG agenda.
- Greg S. will also be talking on Wednesday at a plenary session.
- Chris Lynnes and Barry White are talking about quality at SPG.
- Greg and Barry will participate in SPG
- ISO Data Quality Discussion
- Barry - Quality is one of the major reasons for metadata.
- Greg - Europeans don't want to use ISO because it is still too fluid and has not been improved yet.
- Barry - Temporal Consistency in data quality - whatever ISO tells us about temporal consistency is not formulated enough, has an opinion gap that needs to be filled.
- Actions
- Greg - will try to prepare better list of quality indicators so we could have lively discussions about what community thinks about quality indicators. - For second discussion breakout.
- Greg will send a message to Ted Haberman, also contact Gregg Stensas tell him we expect him on thursday and ask to mention during plenary talks.
- Carol - contacted Steve for NASA quality and will post it on wiki once he emails back. ???
- Carol emailed NEON and...?