Difference between revisions of "ISO Rationale"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(→Yes) |
(→Yes) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==ESIP Response== | ==ESIP Response== | ||
===Yes=== | ===Yes=== | ||
| − | *Henry GZS DISC | + | *Henry – GZS DISC |
| − | * | + | *D. Jacob |
| − | *Gao Chen | + | *Gao Chen – Nasa Larc |
*Xing | *Xing | ||
*Ed Armstrong | *Ed Armstrong | ||
| − | * | + | *Deborah Smith – Discover |
| − | *Rudy Husar | + | *[[user:Rhusar|Rudy Husar]] |
| − | *Ken Casey - | + | *John Scialdone |
| + | *[[user:Kennethcasey|Ken Casey]]: - Not just “why” but “what” was done and “when” | ||
| + | *[[user:Jeff.arnfield| Jeff Arnfield]]: - We track this now for our metadata system but don’t always capture systematically and accessibly for all of our holdings as KC says, above “what: is also critical. We track that too. | ||
| + | |||
[[Category: ISO Metadata]] | [[Category: ISO Metadata]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:23, July 19, 2008
How ISO Does It
Understanding the processing of datasets is critical to understanding their accuracy and applicability for certain tasks. The FGDC Standard provides a framework for tracking process steps that are applied to a dataset. The ISO Standard builds on that framework by adding a rationale element that allows processors to explain why process steps were done.
LI_ProcessStep
+ description : CharacterString
+ rationale [0..1] : CharacterString
+ dateTime [0..1] : DateTime
+ processor [0..*] : CI_ResponsibleParty
+ source [0..*]: LI_Source
ESIP Response
Yes
- Henry – GZS DISC
- D. Jacob
- Gao Chen – Nasa Larc
- Ed Armstrong
- Deborah Smith – Discover
- Rudy Husar
- John Scialdone
- Ken Casey: - Not just “why” but “what” was done and “when”
- Jeff Arnfield: - We track this now for our metadata system but don’t always capture systematically and accessibly for all of our holdings as KC says, above “what: is also critical. We track that too.
