Difference between revisions of "ISO Rationale"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(New page: ==How ISO Does It== Understanding the processing of datasets is critical to understanding their accuracy and applicability for certain tasks. The FGDC Standard provides a framework for tra...) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
+ processor [0..*] : CI_ResponsibleParty<br> | + processor [0..*] : CI_ResponsibleParty<br> | ||
+ source [0..*]: LI_Source<br> | + source [0..*]: LI_Source<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==ESIP Response== | ||
+ | ===Yes=== | ||
+ | Henry GZS DISC | ||
+ | Daniel Jacob | ||
+ | Gao Chen | ||
+ | Xing | ||
+ | Ed Armstrong | ||
+ | Discover | ||
+ | Rudy Husar | ||
+ | Ken Casey - not just "why" but "what" was done and when | ||
[[Category: ISO Metadata]] | [[Category: ISO Metadata]] |
Revision as of 10:10, July 18, 2008
How ISO Does It
Understanding the processing of datasets is critical to understanding their accuracy and applicability for certain tasks. The FGDC Standard provides a framework for tracking process steps that are applied to a dataset. The ISO Standard builds on that framework by adding a rationale element that allows processors to explain why process steps were done.
LI_ProcessStep
+ description : CharacterString
+ rationale [0..1] : CharacterString
+ dateTime [0..1] : DateTime
+ processor [0..*] : CI_ResponsibleParty
+ source [0..*]: LI_Source
ESIP Response
Yes
Henry GZS DISC Daniel Jacob Gao Chen Xing Ed Armstrong Discover Rudy Husar Ken Casey - not just "why" but "what" was done and when