Difference between revisions of "Governance"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 35: Line 35:
 
**Air Quality Cluster was created out of the Executive Committee under Yunck - should change the name to Air Quality Working Group
 
**Air Quality Cluster was created out of the Executive Committee under Yunck - should change the name to Air Quality Working Group
 
**Semantic Web Cluster was to help the EIE mature - should it fall under IT&I?
 
**Semantic Web Cluster was to help the EIE mature - should it fall under IT&I?
**Working Groups are sponsored by Committees - financial oversight by committees as part of their budgets<br>
+
**Working Groups are sponsored by Committees - financial oversight by committees as part of their budgets
 +
**Report-backs on how money was spent to ESIP Federation Assembly<br>
  
 
==='''Recommendations:'''===
 
==='''Recommendations:'''===

Revision as of 16:29, October 15, 2008

Back to Main ESIP page
Back to Implementation Groups

Subgroup Members:

  • Rob Raskin
  • Chuck Hutchinson
  • Bruce Caron

Issues to Be Addressed:

  • Permanently Name Alternate Voting Reps for which no proxy is needed – education and communication are key parts toward the successful implementation of this;
  • What to do with Community Engagement, Commercial Development & Products and Services Committees; look at all committee charters
  • Clusters lifespan – related to membership; finance; AQ was never envisioned to short term; perhaps more appropriate for AQ Cluster to be a WG
  • Membership dues
  • Leadership succession/terms/when elections are held
  • Governance should support strategic plan... meetings should support governance structure

Discussion:

  • Permanently Name Alternate Voting Reps for which no proxy is needed – education and communication are key parts toward the successful implementation of this
    • Is there an issue?
    • What would be required to make the change? Look at Bylaw II.2.3 - get clarification from C&B
    • Resolution from Excom articulating the policy change
    • Primary and Secondary alternates would have to be named
  • What to do with Community Engagement, Commercial Development & Products and Services Committees; look at all committee charters
    • Active committees - Education/IT&I are more self-serving; Inactive committees have larger organizational roles
    • Committee activity review: # of telecons/meetings; # of active people
    • Are committee functions related to ESIP Types? What role might affinity groups play? Belonging to more than 1 ESIP Type?
    • Eliminate committees that are inactive - would require bylaws changes
    • Open process to invite new committee to be formed
    • Invite Outreach Managers from Data Centers to future meetings
    • Community Engagement is now served by Foundation Front Office
    • P&S perhaps getting split among all other committees
    • Commercial Development as a cluster? ping Howard
  • Clusters lifespan – related to membership; finance; AQ was never envisioned to short term; perhaps more appropriate for AQ Cluster to be a WG
    • What are Clusters when they grow up? - Working Groups
    • What are Working Groups when they grow up? - Committees
    • Air Quality Cluster was created out of the Executive Committee under Yunck - should change the name to Air Quality Working Group
    • Semantic Web Cluster was to help the EIE mature - should it fall under IT&I?
    • Working Groups are sponsored by Committees - financial oversight by committees as part of their budgets
    • Report-backs on how money was spent to ESIP Federation Assembly

Recommendations: