Difference between revisions of "FAIR Dataset Quality Information"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 51: Line 51:
  
 
<big>'''Portfolio Management and Repository Certifications ''' </big><br>  
 
<big>'''Portfolio Management and Repository Certifications ''' </big><br>  
* NGDA Data Lifecycle Maturity Model (LMM)[http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/2014_FGDC_BaselineAssessment_AGUPoster_PeltzLewisBlakeColemanJohnstonDeLoatch.pdf (Peltz-Lewis et al. 2014)] <br>
+
* NGDA Data Lifecycle Maturity Model (LMM) [http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/2014_FGDC_BaselineAssessment_AGUPoster_PeltzLewisBlakeColemanJohnstonDeLoatch.pdf  
* WDS-DSA-RDA core trustworthy data repository requirements <br>
+
(Peltz-Lewis et al. 2014)] <br>
* USGS Trusted Data Repository Checklist <br> <br>
+
* WDS-DSA-RDA core trustworthy data repository requirements [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.168411 (Edmunds et al. 2016; updated 2019)]<br>
 +
* USGS Trusted Data Repository Checklist (Faundeen, Kirk & Brown 2017)<br> <br>
  
 
<big>'''FAIR Data Principles ''' </big><br>  
 
<big>'''FAIR Data Principles ''' </big><br>  

Revision as of 11:27, June 5, 2020

Document

This is the document for community guidelines of consistently curating and representing dataset quality information, in line with the FAIR principles.

Overview

This document provides resources for developing community guidelines for consistently curating and representing dataset quality information and captures the outcomes. The guidelines aims to help curate dataset quality information that is findable and accessible, machine- and human-readable, interoperable, and reusable.

Resources

Multi-dimensions of Data and Information Quality:

Existing Fitness for Purpose Assessment approaches Through the Full Life Cycle of Earth Science Datasets:

  • Scientific quality:
    • NASA Technical Readiness Levels for Operations (Mankins 2009)
    • NOAA STAR data product algorithm maturity matrix (Zhou, Divakarla & Liu 2016)
    • Perspectives of data uncertainty (Moroni et al. 2019)
    • OGC UncertML (Williams et al. 2009)
    • Operational Readiness Levels For Disaster Operations (ESIP Disasters Cluster 2018)

Dataset-level metadata quality:

  • Completeness: NCEI Collection-Level Metadata Rubric Tool
  • FAIR metadata checklist – NCEAS MetaDIG
  • Metadata checklist of LTER network data management system (O’Brien et al. 2016)

Portfolio Management and Repository Certifications

(Peltz-Lewis et al. 2014)] 

FAIR Data Principles

  • FAIR Data Principles
  • RDA FAIR Data Maturity Indicators

Organizational Challenges & Approaches

  • NASA’s ESDSWG Data Quality Working Group Recommendations
  • Gaps in Essential Climate Variables Assessment
  • FAIR and Data Management for a Multidisciplinary Research Center

Data Quality Management Framework

  • High Quality Global Data Management Framework for Climate Data (HQ-GDMFC)
  • Conceptual Enterprise Framework for Managing Scientific Data Stewardship


---

Return to Pre-ESIP Workshop: About
Return to Information Quality Cluster Homepage