ESC User Stories

From Federation of Earth Science Information Partners
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

What do we do?

  • Develop user stories so for:
    • ...you to illustrate the concept of the ESC to your constituents.
    • ...as input to other tracks (Technology, Sociological Impacts, Programmatic constraints)
  • Continue developing the repository of stories
    • ...minimally PPTs (already have three from ESIP July 2011: The "Novice" Researcher (Lynnes); The Expert Researcher (Kuo); Science Assessment (Wee)
    • ...possibly indexed by some canonical representation of discipline, audience type (can we use Earth Science Collaboratory User Model?), <others> (see below)
    • ...possibly indexed by NSF Earth^3 capabilities (see below)
  • Develop canonical representation for index to enable
    • ...identification of missing user stories
    • ...identification of opportunities that have been missed (e.g. if somebody realizes that a powerful user story can be enabled by some combination of the index)
  • Develop mapping of user stories to NSF Earth^3 capabilities list? (http://earthcube.ning.com/page/capabilities, dated 2012-12-16), but first:
    • ...are the 14 capabilities useful for this purpose? (some are more obviously useful than others)
    • ...is the capability mapping useful for informing requirements development in the Technology track?
  • Questions:
    • Which is more useful for the development of requirements in the Technology track? Index or capabilities?
    • Ideas for dimensions of this index (e.g. audience type, discipline, etc)? (Again, see Earth Science Collaboratory User Model to avoid starting from scratch on one possible dimension)
    • Do we need to modify the capabilities list proposed by NSF Earth^3 for ESC story purposes?
  • Proposed activity: Strawman for shooting arrows at... present existing 3 use cases against the (A) index and (B) capabilities to generate ideas about how to iterate this forward (BW to come ready with a slide or two)
  • Comments?

How do we do it?

  • Use input from other tracks (Technology, Sociological Impacts, Programmatic constraints).
  • ID small groups of three persons to create short two page deliverables as input to other tracks (schedule and actual deliverables to be determined)
  • Comments?