ESC Implementation Strategies

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Revision as of 08:45, July 8, 2011 by Clynnes (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= Potential Earth Science Collaboratory Implementation Strategies and Tactics = Note: all of these straties == Direct Funding == === Recommend ESC as a program to agencies=== ==...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Potential Earth Science Collaboratory Implementation Strategies and Tactics

Note: all of these straties

Direct Funding

Recommend ESC as a program to agencies

Propose to NSF program

Piggyback off data.gov

Indirect Funding

Branding

Form a joint ESC effort without dedicated funding, and target ESC as the eventual home of components developed to other proposal calls. Hopefully, eventual deployment to ESC would give such proposals an advantage.

  • Pros: Worked for CEOP
  • Cons: May need to be more substantive

NASA ESDSWG

Make ESC a goal of the NASA Earth Science Working Groups.

  • Pros: Technology Infusion, Reuse and Standards and Processes Group currently all work on core needs of the ESC, but are not aiming toward an ESC realization.
  • Cons: Not clear that NASA wants to use ESDSWG for this; also leaves out key partners in other agencies, academia, commercial world...