Difference between revisions of "ESC Cluster Meeting at ESIP 2011 Summer Meeting"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= User Stories = | = User Stories = | ||
| − | * Science Researcher (Kwo-Sen Kuo) | + | * [[Media:ScienceResearcherStory.zip|Science Researcher (prezi)]] (Kwo-Sen Kuo) |
* [[Media:ScientificAssessmentPanel.ppt|Science Assessment Panel]] (Brian Wee) | * [[Media:ScientificAssessmentPanel.ppt|Science Assessment Panel]] (Brian Wee) | ||
* [[Media:NoviceGraduateStudentStory|Novice Graduate Student]] (Chris Lynnes) | * [[Media:NoviceGraduateStudentStory|Novice Graduate Student]] (Chris Lynnes) | ||
Revision as of 15:19, July 19, 2011
User Stories
- Science Researcher (prezi) (Kwo-Sen Kuo)
- Science Assessment Panel (Brian Wee)
- Novice Graduate Student (Chris Lynnes)
ESC Implementation Strategies
Key Questions and Ideas
- Is 5-7 year time frame to build ESC too long?
- How do we leverage other efforts in this area?
- NSF Earth Cube
- NASA Earth Exchange
- Virtual observatories
- International
- More user stories would be helpful
- Project collaboration
- Recast novice grad student as an educational story?
- Will scientists share?
- Some sharing is required by funding agencies, but...
- How to incentivize?
- Suggest 4 main thrusts:
- User Stories, both for outreach and guiding architecture and implementation
- Cyberinfrastructure
- Programmatic (how to get the agencies, including NSF, on the same page)
- Sociological: the sociology of sharing and incentivization
- ESC needs to become a more formal cluster, yes, with telecons, to prepare for the Winter meeting.
- Raw Notes
