Difference between revisions of "ESC 2012 03 19"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(Created page with "= Telecon - 19 Mar 2012 = == Proposing ESIP Meeting Sessions == * "Hackathon" for technical workshops? ** Choose a collaborative platform and attempt to populate and/or use it....") |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*** RAMADDA | *** RAMADDA | ||
*** NASA Earth Exchange | *** NASA Earth Exchange | ||
| − | * Session on enabling technologies? | + | * Planning session |
| + | ** Session on enabling technologies? | ||
* Innovation session--choose 1: | * Innovation session--choose 1: | ||
| − | + | ** How the Collaboratory could enable scientific innovation | |
| − | + | ** How innovation might be used to implement the Collaboratory | |
** Consensus favors #1 | ** Consensus favors #1 | ||
** This led to a discussion on the relative roles of Human Factors and User Stories | ** This led to a discussion on the relative roles of Human Factors and User Stories | ||
*** User stories are "longitudinal" descriptions of use cases, benefits and requirements | *** User stories are "longitudinal" descriptions of use cases, benefits and requirements | ||
*** Human Factors are pervasive considerations for implementing the Collaboratory, but does include some requirements | *** Human Factors are pervasive considerations for implementing the Collaboratory, but does include some requirements | ||
| + | ** Also discussed whether Scientific Innovation had relevance to decision makers | ||
| + | *** Distinguish high-level federal agency from field offices and state agencies | ||
| + | *** The latter may be conservative in adoption of innovations due to limited budgets | ||
| + | ** Focus on innovation in inter-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary science | ||
| + | *** Maybe also citicen science | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Status Updates == | ||
| + | * Technological: planning a EuroGEOSS broker hackathon | ||
| + | ** Also looking at two other technologies | ||
| + | ** Part of selected EAGER proposal for EarthCube | ||
| + | * Programmatic: | ||
| + | ** Recent ROSES/CMAC proposal call has a section targeting collaboratories: Come back in August to see who was selected, whether there is a possibility in leveraging the results of the proposal | ||
| + | ** Earth Cube: 6 technical experiments, 4 community governance groups | ||
| + | *** The groups first need to decide how to work together | ||
| + | * User Stories: looking at framing stories as Before ESC and After ESC | ||
Latest revision as of 08:13, March 26, 2012
Telecon - 19 Mar 2012
Proposing ESIP Meeting Sessions
- "Hackathon" for technical workshops?
- Choose a collaborative platform and attempt to populate and/or use it.
- Would require some prep work, learning about the platform, capabilities, how to use
- Candidate platforms
- HubZero
- RAMADDA
- NASA Earth Exchange
- Planning session
- Session on enabling technologies?
- Innovation session--choose 1:
- How the Collaboratory could enable scientific innovation
- How innovation might be used to implement the Collaboratory
- Consensus favors #1
- This led to a discussion on the relative roles of Human Factors and User Stories
- User stories are "longitudinal" descriptions of use cases, benefits and requirements
- Human Factors are pervasive considerations for implementing the Collaboratory, but does include some requirements
- Also discussed whether Scientific Innovation had relevance to decision makers
- Distinguish high-level federal agency from field offices and state agencies
- The latter may be conservative in adoption of innovations due to limited budgets
- Focus on innovation in inter-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary science
- Maybe also citicen science
Status Updates
- Technological: planning a EuroGEOSS broker hackathon
- Also looking at two other technologies
- Part of selected EAGER proposal for EarthCube
- Programmatic:
- Recent ROSES/CMAC proposal call has a section targeting collaboratories: Come back in August to see who was selected, whether there is a possibility in leveraging the results of the proposal
- Earth Cube: 6 technical experiments, 4 community governance groups
- The groups first need to decide how to work together
- User Stories: looking at framing stories as Before ESC and After ESC
